Distance from a point to a plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from a point P to a plane S using vector projections. The participants clarify that while one method involves taking partial derivatives of the distance expression, a more efficient approach is to find the normal vector of the plane and project the difference vector from point P to any point Q on the plane. The correct formula for the distance is given by the dot product of the vector from P to Q and the unit normal vector of the plane, represented as ##\vec V \cdot \hat n##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically dot and cross products.
  • Familiarity with the concept of normal vectors in geometry.
  • Knowledge of projection methods in linear algebra.
  • Basic proficiency in solving linear equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector projection techniques in detail.
  • Learn about normal vectors and their applications in geometry.
  • Explore the derivation of distance formulas in three-dimensional space.
  • Investigate the properties of dot and cross products in vector analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with geometric concepts and vector analysis, particularly those needing to calculate distances in three-dimensional space.

GwtBc
Messages
74
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


What is the distance from the point P to the plane S?

Homework Equations


## S = \left \{ r_{0} + s(u_{1},u_{2},u_{3})+t(v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}) | s,t \in \mathbb{R} \right \} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I found an expression for the general distance between point P and a point on S, then found an expression for the distance and took the partial derivatives , ## \frac{\partial r}{\partial s} ## and ## \frac{\partial r}{\partial t}## (both of the argument of the square root function) and set both to zero, then solved the resulting linear equations. Is this the right method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will work, but there is an easier way to do it by finding a normal vector of the plane and projecting the difference vector between the point and any point in the plane on it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GwtBc
Orodruin said:
It will work, but there is an easier way to do it by finding a normal vector of the plane and projecting the difference vector between the point and any point in the plane on it.
Wouldn't that just give me another vector in terms of x, y and z that I'd have to minimize?
 
GwtBc said:
Wouldn't that just give me another vector in terms of x, y and z that I'd have to minimize?
No. It gives you the difference vector between the point and the closest point in the plane. You get the distance by computing its magnitude. (Note the projection part of the procedure!)
 
Orodruin said:
No. It gives you the difference vector between the point and the closest point in the plane. You get the distance by computing its magnitude. (Note the projection part of the procedure!)
Got it. Thanks for the help.
 
Equivalently, if ##\vec V## is a vector from P to any point Q on the plane, and ##\hat n## is a unit normal to the plane, then$$|\vec V \times \hat n| = |\vec V|\cdot 1 \cdot \sin\theta = d$$so all you have to remember is to take the magnitude of ##\vec V \times \hat n##.
Edit, added: Please ignore this post. This method works for finding the distance from a point to a line, where ##\hat n## is a unit direction vector along the line.
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
Equivalently, if ##\vec V## is a vector from P to any point Q on the plane, and ##\hat n## is a unit normal to the plane, then$$|\vec V \times \hat n| = |\vec V|\cdot 1 \cdot \sin\theta = d$$so all you have to remember is to take the magnitude of ##\vec V \times \hat n##.
This is not equivalent. You want ##\vec V\cdot \hat n##. The cross product you quote is also dependent on which point in the plane you chose.
 
Orodruin said:
This is not equivalent. You want ##\vec V\cdot \hat n##. The cross product you quote is also dependent on which point in the plane you chose.

You're correct of course. I must have posted that before I was fully awake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K