Distance traveled by a Ball affected by friction after t seconds

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance traveled by a ball affected by friction and rolling resistance on a flat surface. Participants suggest that the ball experiences a constant rate of deceleration due to rolling resistance, complicating the calculation of distance. There is also consideration of whether air resistance should be factored in, particularly for a golf ball rolling on carpet at an initial velocity of 6.5 m/s. Accurate estimates of deceleration may require direct measurements to account for both rolling and air resistance. Further testing is recommended to refine the calculations and obtain precise results.
Volt582
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical math forums to the schoolwork forums
Hi everyone,
i have been trying to find an answer to this problem I have but couldnt find any good answers...
(I dont know much about this stuff, but need a formula for a Project I am currently working on).

So The problem goes as follows:
Assuming we have a ball with a mass of m which is rolling on a flat surface with an initial velocity of v. Lets call the friction coefficiant between the surface and the Ball p. How much distance will the ball have traveled after t seconds when it is constantly affected by friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Volt582 said:
Hi everyone,
i have been trying to find an answer to this problem I have but couldnt find any good answers...
(I dont know much about this stuff, but need a formula for a Project I am currently working on).

So The problem goes as follows:
Assuming we have a ball with a mass of m which is rolling on a flat surface with an initial velocity of v. Lets call the friction coefficiant between the surface and the Ball p. How much distance will the ball have traveled after t seconds when it is constantly affected by friction?
A rolling ball is slowly by rolling resistance, rather than friction. In any case, we can assume a constant rate of deceleration. What do you know about motion with constant acceleration?
 
PeroK said:
A rolling ball is slowly by rolling resistance, rather than friction. In any case, we can assume a constant rate of deceleration. What do you know about motion with constant acceleration?
When I have a constant acceleration I should be able to calculate the distance... But how could you calculate the deceleration?

And maybe another question: Do you think that air resistance should be accounted for as well when we are working with a golf ball on a carpet which is approximately traveling with an initial velocity of 6.5 m/s?
 
Volt582 said:
When I have a constant acceleration I should be able to calculate the distance... But how could you calculate the deceleration?
Rolling resistance is quite complicated. In any case, you are probably going to have to measure things if you want an accurate estimate.
Volt582 said:
And maybe another question: Do you think that air resistance should be accounted for as well when we are working with a golf ball on a carpet which is approximately traveling with an initial velocity of 6.5 m/s?
Probably. But, it would take a bit of work to distinguish the effects of air resistance from rolling resistance. What you will measure directly is a deceleration that involves them both.
 
PeroK said:
Rolling resistance is quite complicated. In any case, you are probably going to have to measure things if you want an accurate estimate.

Probably. But, it would take a bit of work to distinguish the effects of air resistance from rolling resistance. What you will measure directly is a deceleration that involves them both.
mhh ok... Then we will have to perform some more tests. Thanks anyway!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top