Find the Optimal Distance for Dividing a Circle into 9 Equal Areas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Circle
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around dividing a circle with a radius of 32 units into 9 equal areas using a distance d for the dividing lines. The total area of the circle is calculated as A_tot = π * 32^2, leading to a target subarea of A_sub = A_tot / 9. Initial attempts to find d using the formula d = √(A_sub) resulted in discrepancies when calculating individual areas using integrals. The user expresses uncertainty about the validity of their assumptions regarding equal areas and the methods used for area calculation. They seek assistance in minimizing the deviation between the calculated areas to achieve equal division.
Nick89
Messages
553
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was asked this question on another forum and was interested in it... It's somewhat related to what I have been doing lately so I gave it a (few) tries, but I never really worked it out...


Consider a circle with a radius of 32 units. We want to divide the area of the circle into 9 areas that have, if possible, exactly the same area. See the following image:
ezgwig.jpg

The red lines are the 'dividing lines', spaced by a distance d (in the x as well as the y direction).

The areas 1 (blue) and 2 (green) and the area 3 (red) are marked with the colors. Note that there are four areas 1 and four areas 2, they should be equal in area.


The question is how to find the distance d that will yield the optimal result (if possible, that all areas are equal).



The first thing I thought about (but which doesn't seem to be working, see later) is simply to do the following:

We know the area of the complete circle: A_{tot} = \pi 32^2
Therefore, if the 9 areas are to be divided in equal areas, the area of one the subareas will be: A_{sub} = \frac{ \pi 32^2}{9}
We also know the area A_3 since it's just a square: A_3 = d^2
Therefore: d = \sqrt{ \frac{ \pi 32^2}{9}}.


I tried to graph it and it seemed alright to the eye, but I wanted to be sure, so I went on...



The following way I could think of was to calculate the subareas seperately using integrals and then looking for a d that would minimize their deviation.

I came up with the following area's; A_1 is calculated from the top-right area1 and A_2 is calculated from the rightmost area2.

A_1 = \int_\frac{d}{2}^b \left( \sqrt{ 1024-x^2} - \frac{d}{2} \right) \, dx
A_2 = 2 \times \left( \int_b^{32} \sqrt{1024-x^2} \, dx \right) + d \sqrt{1024-\frac{d^2}{4}}
A_3 = d^2
where the limit b is the intersection of the circle with y = d/2:
b = \sqrt{1024-\frac{d^2}{4}}


When I now plugged in the value for d I found above I don't get the same result, I get a different result for each area...


So, I thought, maybe my simple solution above wasn't right.
But now I have found three areas each as a function of d. I should be able to minimize the deviation between the areas for one value of d, right? I can't see any way how to do that though... Maybe taking the absolute value of the deviation (A_1 - A_2 for example) and using solving it's derivative for 0? Even then I only minimized A_1 - A_2 and had nothing to do with A_3...


Where have I gone wrong:
1) Assuming there is a solution where all areas are equal;
2) Assuming this solution was simply to divide the total area by 9 and equaling this to d^2;
3) Calculating the areas using integrals?

I can't see any other mistakes I may have made, so I assume it must be one of the three...

Could anyone help me out here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would calculate the areas (with integrals as needed) as a function of d, then try to minimize
4(A_1-A)^2+4(A_2-A)^2+(A_3-A)^2 with A=1024\pi/9
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K