Divisibility of 19: Bizarre Matrix Problem with Surprising Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Surreal Ike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a matrix problem related to the divisibility of a specific set of numbers by 19. The original poster expresses frustration over not knowing how to approach the problem, which involves demonstrating the divisibility of a matrix without directly calculating its determinant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss properties of determinants, particularly how adding multiples of columns affects the determinant. There is exploration of the relationship between the matrix rows and the given numbers, as well as the implications of linear combinations of the row elements.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a productive dialogue, with some suggesting methods to manipulate the matrix columns to explore the divisibility property. There is an acknowledgment of the connection between the matrix and the provided numbers, although no consensus has been reached on a specific approach yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the problem is not required for homework and may not appear on a test, indicating a focus on understanding rather than immediate application. The relationship between the matrix and the divisibility of the numbers is under scrutiny, with participants questioning the depth of this connection.

Surreal Ike
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I found this odd question in the back of the chapter supplement. I don't need to do it for homework and it probably won't be on the test but the fact that I don't know how to do the problem frustrates me.

Here it is:

* * *

Use the fact that 21,375, 38,798, 34,162, 40,223, and 79,154 are all divisible by 19 to show that

| 2 1 3 7 5 |
| 3 8 7 9 8 |
| 3 4 1 6 2 |
| 4 0 2 2 3 |
| 7 9 1 5 4 |

is divisible by 19 without directly evaluating the determinant.

* * *

It wasn't too hard to notice that the digits of the numbers given were also the digits you get from reading off the numbers in the rows... but this seems like a very superficial relationship!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you remember the property that the determinant of a matrix remain constant if you add a multiple of any column to any other column?
 
No, but now I do. What are you getting at?
 
Try to add some other columns to the last column.
 
The point being that 2(10000)+ 1(1000)+ 3(100)+ 7(10)+ 5= 21375, 3(10000)+ 8(1000) +7(100)+ 9(10)+ 8= 38798, etc. That particular linear combination of the numbers on anyone row is divisible by the same number.
 
Well, if you want to put it *THAT* bluntly...
 
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K