Understanding Division in Index Notation

Click For Summary
Division in index notation can be confusing, particularly regarding summation. When an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation, no summation is involved; a free index must remain free on both sides. The expression a = 1/b_i is nonsensical, while a = 1/b_{ii} is valid. The equation a_i = b_i/c_{jj} can be interpreted correctly with summation over j. Understanding these rules clarifies the use of division in index notation.
sinad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Recently I started to use index notation, but still the division is not clear for me. I'll mention just some simple examples that I'm not sure about:

Does a =\frac{1}{b_i} mean that a = \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{1}{b_i} or a = 1 / \sum_{i = 1}^{3}b_i ?

Similarly, does a_i =\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}} mean that a_i = \sum_{j=1}^{3}\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}} or a = b_i / \sum_{j = 1}^{3}c_{jj} ?

thanks beforehand!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, a = 1/b_i is a nonsensical expression.

a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj} is fine, however. Divisions don't come up very often with vector quantities, though.
 
Muphrid said:
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, a = 1/b_i is a nonsensical expression.

Indeed, I'm sorry, what I wanted to write is a = 1/b_{ii}

Muphrid said:
a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj} is fine

thanks! it is clear now.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
753
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K