DIY automated security system Project

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed DIY automated security system that incorporates a mounted machine gun. Participants explore the design, legality, and practicality of such a device, with a focus on its potential applications and societal implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their project involving an automated security system designed to enhance home safety, mentioning the completion of an automated firing mechanism and the need for further testing.
  • Another participant questions the legality of automating a weapon, raising concerns about regulatory compliance and public safety.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the feasibility of legalizing such a device, citing existing restrictions on firearms and the improbability of widespread acceptance.
  • There are comments on the artistic quality of the design representations, with some participants suggesting they lack engineering value and may resemble comic book illustrations.
  • One participant suggests that the concept might be more suitable for military applications rather than civilian use.
  • A later reply challenges the practicality of the design and the assumptions about market acceptance, emphasizing the difficulty of introducing such a product in a heavily regulated environment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the legality and practicality of the proposed automated security system, with multiple competing views on its feasibility and societal implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential for such a device to be accepted in the market.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the legal landscape surrounding automated weapons and the technical viability of the proposed designs. There are also concerns about the artistic representation of the project lacking necessary engineering detail.

Cactus Jack
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Howdy everyone, I have begun work on an automated security system. Essentially it is a mounted machine gun made to keep your children safe. I have begun work on models and finished the automated firing mechanism, but am still in the early stages of development. On the image below, you will see a graphical representation of the final product.

sent.jpg


There are three separate models at varying prices to enable home security for people of all economic classes. This image is obviously lacking mechanical detail as it must still be tested for flaws created by these first designs. Any opinions on how I could improve on my design or fix possible flaws that could hurt the efficiency of the Automated Security System will be very helpful, thank you for taking your time to assist me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you steal these drawings from a GI-JOE magazine?
 
No, as I said these were drawn up by a graphical artist I hired to make a cleaner and more dynamic representation of my idea than my original sketches had them looking. I am no artist and my original drawings were quite terrible.
 
Is this even legal? (The automation of a weapon).

i_dont_think_so_tim.jpg
 
Well I have started to research into the applicable legal problems that could come into play and I believe as long as it stayed in the house and required a license to possesses it would fall under the right to bear arms. While it would obviously have to pass safety checks and various tests to meet government regulation, I believe with proper design and a firm platform supporting it I could have one in every home in the next decade.

P.S Do you have any suggestions or comments, it would really be helpful.
 
I'm all for guns, but let's be real. There isn't a snowballs chance in hell any state is going to legalize an automated mini-gun.

But you could try selling it to the military.

I'm curious as to how you are marketing this thing though: "To keep my children safe." Do my kids live in Afghanistan or Iraq!?
 
Cactus Jack said:
Well I have started to research into the applicable legal problems that could come into play and I believe as long as it stayed in the house and required a license to possesses it would fall under the right to bear arms. While it would obviously have to pass safety checks and various tests to meet government regulation, I believe with proper design and a firm platform supporting it I could have one in every home in the next decade.

No. No. No. What makes you think that in a country where it's fairly hard to get an assault rifle, you'll be able to get onto the market an automated gatling gun with... what the hell is that, a mounted missile launcher?
 
Cactus Jack said:
No, as I said these were drawn up by a graphical artist I hired to make a cleaner and more dynamic representation of my idea than my original sketches had them looking. I am no artist and my original drawings were quite terrible.
Nevertheless, these are basically just comic book representations (my guess is it was copied from the manual for a video game). They have no engineering value whatsoever.

I'm not sure if this is a joke or not - I'd like to think any junior high kid understands that civilians in the US don't own gatling guns and rocket launchers, and would also know that a comic book drawing isn't an engineering drawing. But a kid in junior high probably wouldn't be hiring a graphic artist either, so I'm not quite sure what is going on here.

I'm locking the thread. Please feel free to restart it with serious discussion. If you don't know what serious discussion looks like, we'll we'll figure it out pretty quick.

This may be moot anyway, though, since variations on what you describe already exist (notice how it looks nothing like what you have sketched...): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx_CIWS
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
331
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
22K