DIY Gas Turbine Blades: Can I Make Them Using Ceramic and Carbon Fiber?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating DIY gas turbine blades using ceramic and carbon fiber materials. Participants explore various design concepts, materials, and challenges associated with building a gas turbine, particularly focusing on axial, multi-stage compressor and turbine designs. The conversation includes technical considerations, potential manufacturing methods, and safety concerns related to high-temperature applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a two-part ceramic casting compound for blade fabrication, emphasizing its high-temperature resistance and the potential for custom shapes.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the brittleness of ceramic materials and the rapid propagation of cracks compared to metals.
  • Some participants mention the challenges of connecting ceramic blades to metal shafts due to differing thermal conductivities and the complexities introduced by using multiple materials at high temperatures.
  • There is a reference to past attempts at using carbon fiber for turbine blades, noting a failed development by Rolls-Royce.
  • A participant shares an anecdote about a homemade turboshaft engine, highlighting the detailed construction process and the challenges of achieving balance and efficiency.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the safety of homemade turbomachinery, emphasizing the need for precision equipment.
  • One participant discusses the potential for collaboration on forming blades and understanding friction forces, while outlining their vision for a turbofan engine design.
  • There is mention of alternative materials, such as aluminum and steel, and the idea of using lost-wax processing for blade creation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the viability of using ceramic and carbon fiber for turbine blades, with some supporting the idea while others highlight significant challenges and risks. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the feasibility and safety of DIY gas turbine construction.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the brittleness of ceramics, the thermal properties of different materials, and the complexities of achieving safe and efficient designs in high-speed turbomachinery. There is also mention of the need for precision in manufacturing processes.

kjjohn
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have been researching DIY gas turbines lately, and I have concluded that I want to make one. :smile: My only issue is that all amateur designs I have seen use turbochargers. I would like to see an axial, multi-stage compressor/turbine design. Obviously this would require one to fabricate the blades yourself, but I believe it can be done. In fact, I have thought of an idea that may work, but I'm no expert, so I would like some more input. My idea is that each blade would be made by casting it out of a 2-part ceramic casting compound, specifically one designed to withstand high-temperatures once cured. This way, you would be able to form the blade to whatever shape you wanted without high-temperature metal casting. Next, the ceramic blade would be layered in carbon fiber/resin layers to increase its tensile strength. I believe my idea would work, given the fact that the ceramics can withstand nearly 4000 degrees (Fahrenheit) in some cases, and the strength of hardened carbon fiber. However, my only concern is that the high temperatures in the engine may cause the epoxy in the carbon fiber to break down. Would this idea work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carbon fibre - being made of carbon and glue is not known for it's fire-proofness.
The difficulty with ceramic blades has always been their brittleness - a small crack in a metal takes time to spread and can be caught by inspections, while a crack in a ceramic spreads incredibly quickly. Think of cutting glass with a diamond wheel - you make an almost invisible scratch in the glass and can snap it easily
 
That was another problem I neglected to mention. Although there is a possibility of this, would it be safe to use? I have been reading up on ceramic turbine parts research, and I know that ceramics are being developed that are design to eliminate this problem, however, they probably won't be available as a casting compound for a while. :smile:
 
People have tried CF turbine blades, Rolls-Royce went bust trying to develop one for the RB211
 
Another big problem with ceramic blades is connection to the shaft. Typically the shafts are metal, and the rotors can be blisks, but the thermal conductivity between the two makes the connection difficult.

You must understand that at those high temperatures using different materials makes things very difficult.
 
I recall seeing somewhere on the web that someone built a homemade turboshaft. They started with a conventional turbo charger and built the power turbine by jigging round tubing in such a way to cut it precisely to form the blades. I don't recall how it was balanced after assembly but the description was VERY detailed. I think the power turbine only spun up to about 20,000 RPM which compared to the rest of a conventional turbo charger is quite slow. If I were to mess around with homemade gas turbines and wanted to fab my own turbine I would try to build the turboshaft. After that was complete I would most likely be satisfied. Building things as a hobbiest that spin really really fast with really really tight tolerances while running really really hot requires a lot of patience. I am sure there will be failures.
 
That was Don Giandomenico. I have read his entire website in detail. He did produce a turboshaft engine in way described above, however, it still used a turbocharger. I believe the turbine was not even stainless steel, and he balanced it by simply drilling holes in the hub until it no longer vibrated. He achieved around 6 horsepower. I believe he could achieve much higher output with multiple compressor stages, and even multiple turbine stages possibly. Obviously turbines welded together from sections of pipe are not optimized for efficiency, but it certainly worked, and seemed to hold together.
 
The word 'homemade' and any sort of turbomachinery, especially high speed like a gas turbine or turbocharger REALLY shouldn't be mixed.

Unless of course you have a full machine shop with precision measuring equipment in your home.
 
kjjohn- I have been thinking about this as well. There's numerous tin-can versions out there, but none of them work to produce any thrust to my knowledge; and all of them overheat.

I believe I may have figured a way to form the blades, but the connection with the shaft, as well as understanding the friction forces involved will take some time. If you'd like to collaborate on this, PM me. We may be able to combine brainpower and manufacturing.

My understanding of a Turbofan (what I'd like to build) is that

1) the turbines drive the compressors and the turbofan blade(s), and the turbofan provides around 80% of the thrust of the engine.

2) the engine functions best when the combustion chamber is at room temperature.

3) gearing is going to be a *****.
 
  • #10
kjjohn said:
I have been researching DIY gas turbines lately, and I have concluded that I want to make one. :smile: My only issue is that all amateur designs I have seen use turbochargers. I would like to see an axial, multi-stage compressor/turbine design. Obviously this would require one to fabricate the blades yourself, but I believe it can be done.

Same here. In fact, you could use aluminum foil-covered wood, so long as you kept the temps and pressures low enough. I'm sure you've seen the candle-driven Christmas "turbines..." Of course they don't have much power except to turn the little hand-painted wood angles...

In fact, I have thought of an idea that may work, but I'm no expert, so I would like some more input. My idea is that each blade would be made by casting it out of a 2-part ceramic casting compound, specifically one designed to withstand high-temperatures once cured. This way, you would be able to form the blade to whatever shape you wanted without high-temperature metal casting.

Have you considered lost-wax processing? It's somewhat of a misnomer that modern blades are made of ceramic, though they do possesses ceramic coatings and certain internal components. Most of the blades these days are nickel-based superalloys.

But as I mentioned before, if you'd like to use steel, it'll work. You just can't use nearly the temps or pressures, but hey - the 707 had steel engines for years. In fact, they used to clean carbon scoring from them by shoveling walnut shells into them. Plus, you can machine steel fairly easily, so for a DIY project, it's a fairly good choice.

Next, the ceramic blade...

Not really. Ceramic is used as a form, but it's chemically removed, leaving a hollow blade.

I know the idea of coupling old turbochargers seems like a cop-out, but I've seen 'em used for everything from go-karts to make-shift turboprops as well as outright compressors for R/C aircraft.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
41K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K