I Do electromagnetic waves fade with distance in vacuum?

Click For Summary
Electromagnetic waves do fade with distance due to the inverse square law, which causes energy density to decrease as the wave spreads over a larger area. However, the frequency of the electromagnetic wave remains constant regardless of distance. Signals from outer space retain enough energy to be detected despite the fading, as they start with significant initial energy. Telescopes can capture these signals even after they have traveled thousands of light years. Understanding these principles clarifies how we can detect distant cosmic signals.
yashraj
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Do electromagnetic wave gets weaker with the increasing distance from the source in its travel ?
I want to know that when a charged particle accelerates then the electromagnetic wave so produced will loose it's strength or can say fades with distance or not ? If yes then what happens to its frequency and also tell me if electromagnetic waves fades away with increasing distance from the source then how physicists detects signals from the outer space which have travelled thousands of light years ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

As an EM wave radiates out into space, the energy is distributed over the surface of a radially growing sphere. That causes the EM wave energy density to be reduced by the inverse square law.

The frequency of the EM wave remains the same.

The signals detected from space start out with incredible energy. After the inverse square law has been applied, there is sufficient energy remaining, to enter the aperture of the telescope, and for the signals to be detected.
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.

As an EM wave radiates out into space, the energy is distributed over the surface of a radially growing sphere. That causes the EM wave to be reduced by the inverse square law.

The frequency of the EM wave remains the same.

The signals detected from space start out with incredible energy. After the inverse square law has been applied, there is sufficient energy remaining, to enter the aperture of the telescope, and for the signals to be detected.
Thank you for the answer. I was actually thinking almost same but I wanted to make sure that I was right.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...