Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the coordination number (CN) of face-centered cubic (FCC) structures, specifically questioning whether it is strictly limited to 12. Participants explore the implications of lattice vacancies and atomic distortions on the symmetry and structural integrity of FCC crystals.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires if FCC structures can have a coordination number other than 12, particularly in the presence of lattice vacancies or distortions.
- Another participant notes that real crystals contain defects, which are typically negligible compared to the total number of atoms.
- A follow-up question asks about the threshold of vacancies required for an FCC structure to lose its symmetry and cease to show FCC-type diffraction peaks.
- It is suggested that the number of vacancies that can be tolerated before losing symmetry depends on various factors, including the crystal's temperature and purity.
- Reference is made to a source indicating that up to one vacancy per 1000 atoms can exist in equilibrium at the melting point of metals, which is considered a high number of vacancies.
- Participants express uncertainty about the stability of a crystal with significant vacancies and whether it can still be classified as a crystal.
- Additional resources are shared, providing background on metallic structures and lattice defects, including defect densities ranging from one defect per 10,000 to 100,000 atoms or less.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether FCC structures can have a coordination number other than 12, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the impact of vacancies on structural symmetry.
Contextual Notes
Participants acknowledge that the discussion is influenced by various factors, including temperature and purity of the crystal, which may affect the presence and impact of defects.