Do one-piece dental implants exist yet?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nikkkom
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the existence and status of one-piece dental implants, exploring their design, functionality, and historical context. Participants examine the differences between one-piece and two-piece implants, including their advantages and disadvantages in dental applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty finding current information on one-piece dental implants and requests links.
  • Another participant asserts that single-tooth implants exist but clarifies that they are typically two or three pieces, not one.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of two-piece implants for bone regeneration and stability, highlighting the risks of attaching crowns too soon.
  • A personal account is shared regarding the adjustment of a two-piece implant crown, emphasizing the practicality of having a removable crown for modifications.
  • One participant argues that the interface of two materials in two-piece implants can lead to bacterial growth, suggesting that a one-piece implant would mitigate this issue.
  • A participant with experience in dental implants notes that one-piece implants have existed since the 1970s but are rarely used due to placement precision requirements and potential complications with modifications.
  • Discussion includes the idea that bacterial contact is more significant at the natural tooth-gum junction than at the implant-crown interface, and mentions modern design features that may reduce bacterial presence.
  • The Straumann-ITI tissue level implant is mentioned as an example of a one-piece implant that connects above the gum line.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the current status and practicality of one-piece dental implants, with multiple competing views on their design, use, and implications for dental health.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the technical aspects of dental implants, including the implications of bacterial growth and the mechanical requirements for successful implantation.

nikkkom
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,075
Reaction score
397
I thought I read about these a few years ago, but for the life of me, I can't find it now. Believe me, I tried.

I would appreaciate if someone has links about current status in this area.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You mean to say something like a single tooth? Yes, that does exist, for quite some time. Have a look here.
 
Wrichik Basu said:
You mean to say something like a single tooth? Yes, that does exist, for quite some time. Have a look here.

No, I meant an implant which is one piece, not two or three subassemblies. In your link, the implant has a titanium piece which is screwed into the jaw bone, and then a crown is attached on it. Two pieces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
The reason for two pieces is to allow the bone to regenerate/consolidate around the implant to make it secure. If the crown is attached too soon, the implant wiggles around in the hole from the chewing forces, eroding and enlarging the hole until the implant falls out (or breaks the bone).
 
Also, it's easier to modify or even replace the crown if it's not embedded directly into the jaw bone. I have one of these implants myself, which had to be adjusted last spring. My dentist removed the crown from its titanium post, used a 3D printer to build it up on one side or make a new one (I forgot which), then trimmed it down gradually to make it mate properly with the tooth above it.
 
Tom.G said:
The reason for two pieces is to allow the bone to regenerate/consolidate around the implant to make it secure. If the crown is attached too soon, the implant wiggles around in the hole from the chewing forces, eroding and enlarging the hole until the implant falls out (or breaks the bone).

Yes, I understand the reasons, but OTOH, any interface of two materials is prone to become a place for bacterial growth. That's why we still can't make fillings which never fall off.
One-piece implant would work as "artificial tooth", with no seams in it.
 
One piece dental implants, at least in the modern form you're thinking of, have been around at least since the carbon post implants were tried in the 1970-80's. I have placed many one-piece implants over the years, but they are rarely used in that placement is exacting - the angulation cannot be changed, at least by much - and modifying them may cause a heat-soak problem - heated bone dies easily.

But you may have a bit of a naive impression of bacterial contact in the mouth. The major "joint" of concern is the naturally occurring sulcus where the tooth and gum meet; the total bacterial contact here is far more significant than that of an implant-to-crown joint. As for the modern joint interface design, they are all offset in a fashion that moves the joint away from direct bone contact. You will also hear arguments that Morse taper joints connecting the implant fixture body to the overlying crown are possibly bacteria-free.

As for presently available implants that are one-piece, the Straumann-ITI tissue level implant is essentially a one-piece implant in that the connection between the pieces is made above the gum-line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K