Do Photons Follow the Rules of Mechanics for Collisions?

AI Thread Summary
Photons exhibit unique behaviors that deviate from classical mechanics, particularly in collision scenarios. They can transfer momentum to other particles, as seen in phenomena like Compton scattering and pair production, where energy is transferred to massive particles or results in the creation of particle pairs. The discussion raises the possibility of creating devices with over 100% efficiency, questioning the conservation of energy, but this is not feasible due to the inherent mechanisms of energy transfer involving photons. Lower energy photons typically convert their energy into heat, while higher energy photons can ionize atoms. Overall, the interactions of photons with matter highlight their complex role in energy and momentum transfer.
Jeebus
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
If you do some simple manipulations of the equations E=hf, E=1/2mv^2, P=mv, and p=h/<lambda>, one can derive that the momentum is h/<lambda> or that it is h/(2<lambda>). I know that photons do not always follow normal mechanics, but do they follow the usual rules for mechanics for collisions?

I have heard of numerous situations in which photons have transferred their momentum to other particles or even larger masses, but it is unclear to me how exactly this works. It seems that one could build a device which would have an efficiency greater than 100 percent. In other words, it would not follow the law of conservation of energy.

Why can this not be done?

Is it because the photons transfer energy through various mechanisms, depending on energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The momentum of a photon is h/&lambda; and yes they can be involved in collisions with free electrons (compton scattering), where their wavelength is depednet on their angle of scattering. Photons can be absorbed by electrons in bound states too.
 
Originally posted by Jeebus
I have heard of numerous situations in which photons have transferred their momentum to other particles or even larger masses

Is this why you say that...

...It seems that one could build a device which would have an efficiency greater than 100 percent.

??

The energy of a particle is given by

E2 = m2c4 + p2c2

A photon, being massless, has an energy E = pc, which can be quite substantial, and it definitely can be transferred to massive particles.
 
a photon transfers its momentum or used to increase orbit enegy? 2 different cases or what? Exactly how does it transfer momemtum
 
In lower energy photons it usually results in heat. Higher energy photons, in about the UV range or greater, can ionize atoms by ejecting electrons. On the extreme end the photons can undergo Pair Production, where a photon interacts with a nucleus and its energy is used to create pairs of particles such as an electron and positron.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top