Do Vector Components Represent Displacement?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HyperActive
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement Vectors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical meaning of vector components, particularly whether they represent displacement or another quantity. Participants explore definitions of vectors and their components, considering their implications in various contexts such as physics and mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes two definitions of vectors: as entities with size and direction, and as displacements in space, questioning how displacement fits into the definition of a vector.
  • Another participant asserts that vector components are vectors aligned with a coordinate system and can represent various quantities like positions, forces, or moments.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that displacement is a specific example of a vector, and that components represent the same quantity as the original vector but can also be seen as abstractions without necessarily corresponding to physical entities like force or displacement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether vector components represent displacement or if they are merely abstractions. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential ambiguity in defining vectors and their components, noting that the interpretation may depend on the context in which they are used.

HyperActive
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
I'm just starting to learn about vectors, and I was trying to figure out what the vector components mean physically. I've seen two definitions of vectors, and the first is a that a vector is something with a size and a direction. The second definition I saw defined vectors as "displacements in space" and that given an example vector, say (3,4,1) that would represent a displacement of 3 in the x direction, 4 in the y direction and 1 in the z direction.

This made a lot of sense to me intuitively - that looking at it as displacement would explain why parallel vectors are equal and why vectors are coordinate-independent. However, although I don't know much about it, I know displacement is defined to be a vector in itself, so I can't see how it could be part of the definition of a vector.

So my question is, do vector components represent displacement? And if the don't, what physical quantity/term do they represent?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vector components are just other vectors, albeit ones which are usually parallel with a coordinate system or other convenient reference. Vectors can be used to represent positions in space, forces, moments, or other quantities which are composed of a magnitude and a direction.
 
HyperActive said:
So my question is, do vector components represent displacement? And if the don't, what physical quantity/term do they represent?

Thanks :)
The way I read this, it seems the wrong way round. Displacement is an example of a Vector. A Vector is not (necessarily) a Displacement.
The components represent the same quantity as the original vector. The 'deeper' significance of what they mean is that they can be just an abstraction. There doesn't have to be a Force, Displacement or E Field in that particular direction. It's just convenient for the purpose of doing the calculation.
 
Thank you both :) I think I understand now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K