Do you think my dog has wolf blood in her (DNA testing)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pleonasm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood Testing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a dog's behavior and potential wolf ancestry, specifically focusing on a supposed Alaskan Malamute and Golden Retriever mix. The owner notes the dog's hypersensitivity to stimuli and skittishness, which are not typical for either breed. There is debate about the meaning of "wolf blood," with some participants arguing that it is an unscientific term and suggesting that DNA tests could identify recent wolf ancestry if present. The conversation highlights the complexities of dog behavior, emphasizing that individual traits can arise from various factors, including genetics, upbringing, and socialization. Participants caution against overemphasizing the importance of breed in explaining behavior, suggesting that training and socialization play significant roles. The discussion also touches on the reliability of DNA tests and the potential for misinterpretation of results, especially regarding behavioral traits linked to breed characteristics. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of dog behavior and genetics rather than relying solely on breed labels or assumptions.
  • #51
Pleonasm said:
Probably the German Shepherd in it, not the Mal. GSD tend to be very dog aggressive.

I'm sorry, but you're fooling yourself if you think Alaskian Malamutes aren't aggressive. They're cities in the US that have restrictions on them, they've killed 7 less people than German Shepard (Just so we're clear, the number is 12 vs 19), while not even comparing to the popularity of them, and finally they're an insurance risk (as in some insurance companies won't even cover your home if you own one). Now, what does this tell you about the Malamute?

You can sit there and keep lying to yourself that the dog you have in front of you is suppose to be fluffy, nice and not aggressive or you can accept reality, read up on their behavior, and train your dog accordingly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
romsofia said:
I'm sorry, but you're fooling yourself if you think Alaskian Malamutes aren't aggressive. They're cities in the US that have restrictions on them, they've killed 7 less people than German Shepard (Just so we're clear, the number is 12 vs 19), while not even comparing to the popularity of them, and finally they're an insurance risk (as in some insurance companies won't even cover your home if you own one). Now, what does this tell you about the Malamute?

You can sit there and keep lying to yourself that the dog you have in front of you is suppose to be fluffy, nice and not aggressive or you can accept reality, read up on their behavior, and train your dog accordingly.

Not to familiar with these type of dogs. Never really cared for them. However, I am skeptical about claims of dog attacks. Certain dogs require more physical activity than others. Ie., a Labrador, German Shepard, Great Dane vs Chihuahua, poodle, insert tiny dog here. Americans are known to be couch potatoes...
Yes, some dogs require more expertise to properly nurture and train them, but it is not ok to put a blanket statement over XYZ dog breed.

Not really the animals fault if they get an incompetant owner...
It amazes me how I have seen many people with Huskies, and the owners have no clue...
 
  • #53
romsofia said:
I'm sorry, but you're fooling yourself if you think Alaskian Malamutes aren't aggressive. They're cities in the US that have restrictions on them, they've killed 7 less people than German Shepard (Just so we're clear, the number is 12 vs 19), while not even comparing to the popularity of them, and finally they're an insurance risk (as in some insurance companies won't even cover your home if you own one).

Source.. .
 
  • #54
MidgetDwarf said:
It can be that you're dog does not respect you in the master/servant relationship. ...

What are you talking about? They're supposed to be self reliant. And there is no requirement for the dog to say hello to me. It has nothing to do with leadership.
 
  • #55
romsofia said:
they've killed 7 less people than German Shepard (Just so we're clear, the number is 12 vs 19),

Are you talking about babies/infants? Golden Retrievers have killed those too. It says nothing about the breed.
 
  • #56
Btw, a working line German Shepherd, you know those that are supposed to "mentally stable" , snapped at me in a dog park, and bit my shoulder out of left field. My dog was not attentitive to what transpired, but if she would have been, and the attack would have been prolonged, that GSD would have been killed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
78
Views
12K
Replies
65
Views
10K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Back
Top