Does Adding the Boundary of a Set A Affect Its Distance Metric?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yifli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the distance metric \(\rho(x,A)\) is equal to \(\rho(x,\bar{A})\), where \(\bar{A}\) represents the closure of set \(A\). The key definitions include \(\rho(x,A)=glb\{\rho(x,\alpha),\alpha \in A\}\) and the boundary \(\partial A\) defined as the difference between the closure and the interior of \(A\). The participants emphasize that if \(A\) is closed, then \(A=\bar{A}\), and if \(A\) is open, adding boundary elements does not affect the distance metric. A proof by contradiction is suggested as a viable approach to establish this relationship rigorously.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of distance metrics in topology
  • Familiarity with the concepts of closure and interior of sets
  • Knowledge of the least upper bound (glb) principle
  • Basic proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of distance metrics in metric spaces
  • Learn about the closure and interior of sets in topology
  • Explore the concept of boundaries in topological spaces
  • Practice proof techniques, focusing on proof by contradiction
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology and metric spaces, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of distance metrics and set boundaries.

yifli
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that [tex]\rho(x,A)=\rho(x,\bar{A})[/tex], where [tex]\rho[/tex] is a distance metric

Homework Equations


[tex]\rho(x,A)=glb\left\{\rho(x,\alpha),\alpha \in A \right\}[/tex]
[tex]\bar{A}[/tex] is the closure of A
[tex]\partial A[/tex], the boundary of an arbitrary set A is the difference between its closure and its interior

The Attempt at a Solution


If A is a closed set, then [tex]A=\bar{A}[/tex]
If A is open, I want to prove adding boundary element of A has no impact on [tex]\rho(x, A)[/tex]. this seems to be intuitive, but can't come up with a rigorous proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My initial reaction is that proof by contradiction will be your best bet. It's clear that [tex]\rho(x,A)\geq\rho(x, \bar{A})[/tex] since [tex]A\subseteq\overline{A}[/tex], so assume that the inequality is strict, and try to derive a contradiction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K