Does an impulse contribute to both linear and angular momentum?

Click For Summary
An impulse applied to a sphere affects both its linear and angular momentum, but these two types of momentum are fundamentally different and cannot be directly compared or combined. When a force is applied, the linear impulse is calculated as FΔt, while the angular impulse is FrΔt, where r is the radius. This distinction highlights that linear impulse and angular impulse have different units (Ns for linear and Nms for angular), making them incompatible for addition or subtraction. The discussion emphasizes that while both impulses result from the same force, they contribute separately to the overall momentum of the object. Understanding this separation is crucial for analyzing motion in physics.
etotheipi
As an analogue, if 5J of work is done on an object then the linear KE might increase by 2J and the angular by 3J, so the work is divided between the linear and rotational forms.

Now suppose there is a sphere sliding on a frictionless surface. If an impulse of magnitude 1Ns is applied to the edge of the sphere (in a small enough time interval so that it can be considered to be in one direction only), does the impulse divide between change in linear and angular momentum?

If not, then for instance if the sphere is of radius 1m, the angular impulse is 1Ns and the linear impulse is also 1Ns, which means the 'overall' momentum of the sphere increases by 2Ns.

The question arises from a sort of similar situation in part b) of question A1 under this link https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2019/upload/USAPhO-2018-Solutions.pdf, where the same impulse of friction has been applied to both the rotational momentum and linear momentum separately instead of splitting up.

Sorry if I'm missing anything obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
If not, then for instance if the sphere is of radius 1m, the angular impulse is 1Ns and the linear impulse is also 1Ns, which means the 'overall' momentum of the sphere increases by 2Ns.
Angular impulse would be torque times time, so the units would be Nms not Ns. So in this sense the situation between rotational KE and linear KE is very different. Both of those are different parts of the same thing with the same underlying units. But linear impulse and angular impulse are not parts of the same thing, they are different things with different units. You cannot add, subtract, split, or otherwise compare them.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
Dale said:
Angular impulse would be torque times time, so the units would be Nms not Ns. So in this sense the situation between rotational KE and linear KE is very different. Both of those are different parts of the same thing with the same underlying units. But linear impulse and angular impulse are not parts of the same thing, they are different things with different units. You cannot add, subtract, split, or otherwise compare them.

Right yes that was quite sloppy of me! I suppose then if the force is of magnitude F, we get a linear impulse of F \Delta t in addition to an angular impulse Fr \Delta t. Which means that if the linear impulse is \Delta p, the angular impulse is r \Delta p.
 
Yes, assuming ##r## is constant during the impulse.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
22K