B Does Combined Luminosity of LEDs Add Up?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euan12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity
AI Thread Summary
The combined luminosity of a green and red LED, each with a luminosity of 2 W, is generally considered to be 4 W when measured together. However, the actual output can vary based on the angle of emission, as the LEDs are not isotropic emitters. This means that if the LEDs are not aligned properly, the effective power received from each may differ. Therefore, while the theoretical total is 4 W, practical conditions can affect the perceived luminosity. Proper alignment and orientation are crucial for achieving the expected combined luminosity.
Euan12345
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Say you had a green and red LED, both with a luminosity of 2 W would the combined luminosity be 4 W or still 2 W?
Say you had a green and red LED, both with a luminosity of 2 W would the combined luminosity be 4 W or still 2 W?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Euan12345 said:
Summary:: Say you had a green and red LED, both with a luminosity of 2 W would the combined luminosity be 4 W or still 2 W?

Say you had a green and red LED, both with a luminosity of 2 W would the combined luminosity be 4 W or still 2 W?

On the face of it, I would say 'yes', since luminosity is a measure of total output power. However, your sources aren't isotropic emitters: the radiance of these sources strongly depend on the angle with respect to each emitter's surface normal.

What that means is that if the sources are not facing the same direction, the received power from each source is likely different.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
207
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top