Does Exerting Force on a Stationary Object Require Energy?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Peppino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of work and energy in physics, particularly whether exerting force on a stationary object requires energy. Participants explore the definitions of work and energy, the implications of static versus dynamic scenarios, and the physiological aspects of exerting force without movement.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between exerting force and energy expenditure when a box remains stationary.
  • Another participant clarifies that while energy is required to exert force, no work is done on the box because there is no movement, with static friction counteracting the applied force.
  • A third participant emphasizes the specific definitions of "work" and "energy" in physics, noting that holding an object stationary does not constitute work, despite the physical effort involved.
  • It is mentioned that energy can exist in forms that do not perform work, such as in an electromagnetic field, and that work is defined as force times distance, which does not apply if there is no movement.
  • The concept of power is introduced as related to work done over time, highlighting the distinction between energy expenditure and work performed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of work and energy, but there is ongoing debate regarding the implications of exerting force on stationary objects and the physiological aspects of energy expenditure.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the nuances of energy expenditure in the context of biological processes and the definitions of work in physics, indicating that the discussion may involve assumptions about definitions and the nature of energy transfer.

Peppino
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about what exactly work/energy is. I understand that if I exert 10 N o a box over a distance of 10 m, 100 J of energy are expended. However, say I exert 10 N on a 100 kg box, and it does not move, why is no energy expended? Such an action certainly requires energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is transferred in the form of chemical reactions in your body that fuel your exerting of force. However, no work is done on the 100-kg box due to the fact that there is no movement. The force of static friction counteracts the force you exert.
 
First, realize that physicists have a very specific mathematical meaning of "work" and "energy" and they are not the same as "effort".

You should meditate on the case of a table. A table can hold things up indefinitely without expending any energy at all. No energy is required, because while the table is pushing up on the object, the object isn't moving, so no work is being done.

It may be tiring to hold the same object stationary in your outstretched palm, but that doesn't mean that your palm is doing work *on the object,* any more than the table is doing work on the object when it supports the object. You get tired because the biology of your muscles is such that they need to burn fuel just to create a force in the first place.

If the object doesn't move, your muscles burn chemical fuel, releasing energy, but that energy just ends up heating up your muscles instead of doing work on the object.
 
Energy is the ability, the potential do do work, rather than actually doing work. So an electromagnmetic field, for example, contains energy, but it might just sit there without doing any work.

Work is defined as a force times a distance. So in general energy has the ability to exert such a force, but unless something is moved it does not fit the definition. You can push, for example, as hard as you like against a wall but unless it moves the definition says no work has been done. But as noted above, you HAVE expended energy trying to push it.

A closely related concept is power...work expended per unit time...So if you perform some movement,some work, like accelerating a car, the faster you do it the more POWER is expended. These definitions take some time to get used to, sort of like the distinction between 'affect' and 'effect'...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K