Does Firing a Gun from a Moving Vehicle Affect Bullet Speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thorguy57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
AI Thread Summary
Firing a gun from a moving vehicle results in the bullet's speed being additive to the vehicle's speed relative to an observer at rest. If a vehicle travels at 500 fps and the bullet normally travels at 1000 fps, the bullet's speed would be 1500 fps relative to an observer on the ground. However, to the shooter inside the vehicle, the bullet still travels at 1000 fps. This discussion highlights that the perceived speed of the bullet varies depending on the observer's frame of reference. Overall, for practical purposes, the bullet's speed can be considered 1500 fps relative to the ground.
thorguy57
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I got into a discussion at work and need this question answered. One of us thinks if you are traveling 500 Fps and shoot a gun out the window and the bullet normally travels 1000 Fps it will now be traveling 1500 Fps. THe other one of us thinks the bullet will still be traveling at 1000 Fps. Please help end this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The bullet will be moving at 1500fps relative to an observer at rest relative to the shooter moving at 500fps. The shooter considers himself to be at rest so the bullet is traveling at 1000fps relative to him, while an observer at rest relative to the shooter must add the shooters speed to the bullets 1000fps, making the bullets speed 1500fps relative to him.

Now, it doesn't sound like your interested in the different frames so the big picture is that the bullets speed relative to the ground beneath your feet is 1500fps.
 
At those speeds the answer would be 1500 fps. If the speeds were close to the speed of light then it would be more complicated. But for the sake of your argument, it's safe to say 1500 is the right answer.
 
double post...
 
An observer from the vehicle would measure the projectile at the normal 1000fps. An observer on the ground would measure it as 1500fps (the velocities of the vehicle and projectile would in fact be additive from his point of view).

This is of course not taking into account the added air resistance the extra 500fps would add, etc etc etc.

Just for the sake of coolness, if the vehicle were going forwards at 1000 ft/s, and the gun were fired backward (the opposite of the direction the vehicle were headed) with equal velocity 1000 ft/s, the bullet would appear to simply drop as if dropped from someone's hand to an observer on the ground :D
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top