Does Force Travel Faster Than Light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hypothetical scenario of whether a force can travel faster than light, specifically through the example of an indestructible bar and the implications of moving one end of the bar. Participants explore concepts related to special relativity and the nature of rigid bodies in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving a bar that is 1 light minute long and questions whether both ends would respond simultaneously to a push, or if there would be a delay due to the speed of light limit.
  • Another participant asserts that the bar does not move all at once, as internal forces take time to propagate and cannot exceed the speed of light.
  • A different participant emphasizes that the concept of an "infinitely rigid object" is impossible in the context of relativity.
  • Some participants compare the original question to other hypothetical scenarios that involve breaking the laws of physics, suggesting that such questions may not yield meaningful answers.
  • One participant mentions that while there is nothing inherently prohibiting the existence of fantastical elements like dragons, the premise of a perfectly rigid rod contradicts the principles of special relativity.
  • A participant shares a link to an article discussing the impossibility of sending signals faster than light through a rigid rod.
  • Another participant references a video demonstrating the speed of "force" through a solid rod, contributing an experimental perspective to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the premise of the question involves impossible assumptions and that the concept of a perfectly rigid object does not align with the principles of relativity. However, there remains some debate about the implications of these assumptions and how they relate to the original question.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made about the nature of forces and rigid bodies, as well as the implications of special relativity on such hypothetical scenarios. The exploration of these ideas is constrained by the recognition that the premises themselves may not be physically realizable.

MrSimp
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Came up with a thought experiment, and since I'm only 18 I assumed there likely would be a simple answer that someone older than me would know. I went to my high school physics teacher and his response made me more interested.
Imagine a plane 1 light minute across. Now imagine 1 person on either and of that plane. Between them, is a thin indestructible bar that is 1 light minute in length. In the center of this plane, a simple device has a wire that leads to a motion sensor on the left side of the bar. If the left side of the bar moves, 30 seconds later, the device in the center will make it known. Perhaps a green light on the left side will activate. Vice versa for the right side, another sensor is present on the other end and another light is present on the right side of this same device.

My question:
To my understanding, if the person on the left side of the bar pushed the bar forward by 1 meter, the device 30 light seconds away would light up on its left side after a delay of 30 seconds. But since the bar is being moved forward, towards the opposing end, the right side would have to move too. My question is, would both lights on this device go off at the same time (meaning by pushing one end of this bar, the other end moved in unison), or would there be a delay of 1 minute 30 second for the right-sided light, since the force would travel along at the speed of light.

I asked this to my physics teacher, and he compared the question to asking, "If I were to turn off the sun's gravity, would all the planets start drifting away at the same time, or would Mercury start to drift several minutes before Jupiter." He wondered if this question was about general or special relativity. We both understood the speed of light to be a hard limit, but if this hypothetical, indestructible, 1-light-minute-long bar existed, what would happen in this experiment? Would both lights go off at the same time, meaning both ends of the bar moved, or not?

My teacher made another good point though, he said that asking this question is like asking "If dragons were real, could they breath fire?" The question itself, like with turning off the sun's gravity, already breaks the laws of physics with its premise. Meaning, its answer lay outside the laws of physics too, the entire question is pure fantasy, only possible in an imagination, improvable.

But does anyone think they have an answer, as I'm genuinely quite curious to learn what people who know more than me have to say about it, without it being written off as impossible to answer, simply because the premise would be difficult to replicate. Say this was done with an atom, instead of a long bar.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MrSimp said:
since the bar is being moved forward, towards the opposing end, the right side would have to move too.
But the bar does not move all at once. The internal forces in the bar that cause the rest of the bar to move when you push on one end take time to travel--and they cannot travel any faster than light. So the far end of the bar will not move until at least one light travel time after the end that is pushed. (In any real bar, it will take longer for the far end of the bar to move, because the speed of propagation of internal forces inside real materials, which is basically the speed of sound in the material, is much slower than the speed of light.)

In short, the concept of an "infinitely rigid object", where pushing on any part of it causes the whole object to move all at once, is impossible in relativity.

Edit: The above is saying the same thing as the Insights article that @berkeman linked to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and PeroK
MrSimp said:
Thank you so much! This is the perfect answer.
Keep asking good questions. PF is a great place to learn. :smile:
 
MrSimp said:
My teacher made another good point though, he said that asking this question is like asking "If dragons were real, could they breath fire?" The question itself, like with turning off the sun's gravity, already breaks the laws of physics with its premise. Meaning, its answer lay outside the laws of physics too, the entire question is pure fantasy, only possible in an imagination, improvable.
It is even a bit further than that. There is nothing per se prohibiting the existence of dragons. SR predicts that there are no perfectly rigid rods (which is the appropriate term, "indestructible" just means it cannot be destroyed, not that it can't be bent or compressed) so asking what SR would say about them is quite literally asking what SR predicts if it doesn't apply.
 
MrSimp said:
he compared the question to asking, "If I were to turn off the sun's gravity, would all the planets start drifting away at the same time, or would Mercury start to drift several minutes before Jupiter."
Like the other question, this one contains an impossible hidden assumption. In this case, it is not possible to “turn off” gravity or to make mass disappear.
 
This was a fun video, showing experimentally the speed of "force" through a "solid" rod
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PAllen, PeroK and MrSimp

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K