Does G(x) = x^2 - e^{1/(1+x)} Assume a Value of 0 for 0 < x < 2?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function G(x) = x^2 - e^{1/(1+x)} assumes a value of 0 for exactly one real number x in the interval (0, 2). Utilizing the Intermediate Value Theorem, it is established that G(0) < 0 and G(2) > 0, confirming the existence of at least one root in this interval. Furthermore, the derivative G'(x) = 2x + e^{1/(1+x)}/(1+x)^2 indicates that G(x) is strictly increasing for 0 < x < 2, ensuring the uniqueness of the root.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Intermediate Value Theorem
  • Familiarity with the Mean Value Theorem
  • Knowledge of derivatives and critical points
  • Basic exponential functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Intermediate Value Theorem in real analysis
  • Learn how to apply the Mean Value Theorem to different functions
  • Explore the behavior of derivatives to determine function monotonicity
  • Investigate the properties of exponential functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians analyzing function behavior, and anyone interested in the application of theorems in real analysis.

calcnd
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Use the Intermediate Value Theorem and/or the Mean Value Theorem and/or properties of G&#039;(x) to show that the function G(x) = x^2 - e^{\frac{1}{1+x}} assumes a value of 0 for exactly one real number x such that 0 < x < 2 . Hint: You may assume that e^{\frac{1}{3}} &lt; 2.

So I'm completely lost.

Here's the first thing I tried:

G(x) = 0

0 = x^2 - e^{\frac{1}{1+x}}

e^{\frac{1}{1+x}} = x^2

lne^{\frac{1}{1+x}} = lnx^2

\frac{1}{1+x} = 2lnx

1 = 2(1+x)lnx

\frac{1}{2} = (1+x)lnx

Which isn't quite getting me anywhere.

And I'm not sure how the mean value theorem is going to help me out much more since:

G&#039;(c) = \frac{G(2) - G(0)}{2-0}

2c + (1+c)e^{\frac{1}{1+c}} = \frac{[2^2-e^{\frac{1}{3}}] - [0^2 - e]}{2}

4c + (2+2c)e^{\frac{1}{1+c}} = 4 - e^{\frac{1}{3}} + e

Which isn't going to simply easily.

Oy vey...

Any help or hints would be appreciated.

Edit: There, I think I finally got it to render correctly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Intermediate value theorem: G(0)<0, G(2)>0, so there is at least one root between. Now, how can you show it's going to be unique using G'(x)?
 
Hrm, that's what I'm not sure of.

I know the x value is within the interval, due to the intermediate value theorem, as you stated.

I could suggest that I solve G&#039;(x)=0, but I could imagine that would be useless as there's no reason to think that G(c)=0 is a critical point.

:S
 
Look at G&#039;(x) and decide what its properties are for 0<x<2. Then decide what that tells you about what G(x) is doing on (0,2).
 
Heh... I noticed I did my derivative entirely wrong. I guess that's why you shouldn't use the computer when you're tired.

Anyways,

G(0)=0^2-e^(\frac{1}{1+0})
=-e

Which is < 0

G(2)=2^2-e^{\frac{1}{1+2}}
=4-e^{\frac{1}{3}}

Which is > 0

Meaning G(x)=0 is contained somewhere between x=0 and x=2.

G&#039;(x)=2x + {e^{\frac{1}{1+x}}\over{(1+x)^2}}

But I'm not having an easy time trying to solve this equal to zero to find my critical numbers. It seems relatively safe to assume that G(x) is increasing on this interval.
 
Last edited:
Can you see whether G'(x) is positive or negative for positive x?
 
I can. But how does that help me determine the value of X at which G(X) equals zero? :(
 
Try graphing it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K