Does H = XX+YY spontaneously break symmetry in 1D?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d Break Symmetry
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I am working in 1D here. For the ferromagnetic Ising model ##H = -\sum_k X_k X_{k+1}## (or ##H = -YY##) we know that the ground state is gapped and has a twofold degeneracy due to SSB (spontaneous symmetry breaking) of the spin flip symmetry ##P = Z_1 Z_2 Z_3 \cdots##.

I am now interested in the Hamiltonian ##H = -XX - YY##. This is known to be gapless (as can be derived using a Jordan-Wigner transformation). However, is it known whether or not this displays spontaneous symmetry breaking? Note that it has a continuous symmetry ##SO(2) = U(1)##, and I am not asking whether it continuously breaks in 1D (as Coleman-Mermin-Wagner implies that does not happen) but rather whether there is still the discrete SSB similar to what happens for the above ##XX## Ising case. Moreover, how can one show it? (Analytically? Numerically?)
 
Hey nonequilibrium,

This is the XY model. It is exactly solvable using free fermions and there is no symmetry breaking in the model. The fermion ground state is a Fermi gas which is translation invariant, time reversal invariant, and preserves spin rotation symmetry.

Note that, if I understood what you are suggesting correctly, it is not possible to "discretely" break a continuous symmetry. If you break a continuous symmetry you will get a Goldstone mode. You could imagine breaking some discrete symmetry, like time reversal or lattice translation, but that does not happen in this case.

Hope this helps.
 
Physics Monkey said:
Note that, if I understood what you are suggesting correctly, it is not possible to "discretely" break a continuous symmetry. If you break a continuous symmetry you will get a Goldstone mode. You could imagine breaking some discrete symmetry, like time reversal or lattice translation, but that does not happen in this case.
I think what is meant is that the Ising model has only a discrete symmetry as sz can only point either up or down.
In the XY model, the spin can lie anywhere in the xy plane, so the symmetry is continuous (which can't be broken in 1d).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top