Does light contain kinetic energy?

Click For Summary
Light contains kinetic energy, which is equal to its total energy, despite being massless. The discussion explores the analogy between electromagnetic waves and harmonic oscillators, suggesting that individual wave components can be treated similarly in terms of energy. While some participants argue that light can have mass in certain contexts, such as in Bessel beams, the primary consensus is that light's kinetic energy is fundamentally tied to its energy. The conversation also touches on the complexities of light's behavior and properties, particularly in superimposed wave scenarios. Overall, light's kinetic energy is a well-established concept in physics, linked to its energy rather than requiring a separate designation.
Ingrid Eldevj
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does light contain kinetic energy as it moves, or does it require mass.
 
Science news on Phys.org
It has kinetic energy, equal to its total energy because it has no mass.
 
Yes, light has kinetic energy and the photon is a massless particle so the light has no mass.
 
mfb said:
It has kinetic energy, equal to its total energy because it has no mass.

This is interesting.. If I make a Fourier series or integral to represent an electromagnetic wave traveling in vacuum, the individual plane wave components act similarly to harmonic oscillators, don't they? Then the individual modes should have Hamiltonian functions that consist of terms that are equivalent to the kinetic and potential energies in ##H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}kx^2##... Does the total amount of "kinetic energy", as defined by this equivalence, have some actual name and physical significance?
 
hilbert2 said:
the individual plane wave components act similarly to harmonic oscillators, don't they
The concepts are not completely unrelated, but I'm not sure if we can call that "similarly".

The amount of kinetic energy of a beam of light is just its energy. It doesn't need an additional special name because "energy" is a good name already.
 
mfb said:
It has kinetic energy, equal to its total energy because it has no mass.

It has kinetic energy, equal to its total energy if it has no mass. Light can have mass and that's not limited to exotic objects like a geon. Almost all light you see in everyday life (e.g. sunlight) has mass. Even single photons can have mass (e.g. a single photon bessel beam).
 
DrStupid said:
It has kinetic energy, equal to its total energy if it has no mass. Light can have mass and that's not limited to exotic objects like a geon. Almost all light you see in everyday life (e.g. sunlight) has mass. Even single photons can have mass (e.g. a single photon bessel beam).

Mind elaborating on this?
 
Drakkith said:
Mind elaborating on this?

I'm afraid my English is not good enough for this phrase.
 
  • #10
DrStupid said:
I'm afraid my English is not good enough for this phrase.

Would you mind elaborating about your previous post? Would you explain it in more detail?
 
  • #11
In case of the geon it is quite easy to understand (even though it is was the most complicate example). It consists of light only but has enough mass to contain itself by its own gravity. The mass of normal light is not as easy to explain. Let's try it with the very simple case of two plane light waves in vacuum, superimposing each other with the angle ##\alpha##. That means for the momentums

\frac{{p_1 \cdot p_2 }}{{\left| {p_1 } \right| \cdot \left| {p_2 } \right|}} = \cos \left( \alpha \right)

If every wave has the energy E/2 then we also have

\left| {p_1 } \right| = \left| {p_2 } \right| = \frac{E}{{2 \cdot c}}

That results in the total momentum

p^2 = \left( {p_1 + p_2 } \right)^2 = \left[ {1 + \cos \left( \alpha \right)} \right] \cdot \frac{{E^2 }}{{2 \cdot c^2 }}

and therefore in the mass

m = \sqrt {\frac{{E^2 }}{{c^4 }} - \frac{{p^2 }}{{c^2 }}} = \frac{E}{{c^2 }} \cdot \sin \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)

of the resulting light wave which travels with the speed

\left| v \right| = \frac{{\left| p \right| \cdot c^2 }}{E} = c \cdot \cos \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)

along the bisecting line between the original waves. Of course normal light and Bessel beams are much more complex but the principle is the same. Plane parallel light waves (e.g. lasers) are exceptional cases in everyday life.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
776
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K