Does Monotone Convergence imply Convergence Subsequence?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Results

i) if [itex](a_n)[/itex] tends to L as n tends to infinity, then [itex]a_{n_r}[/itex] tends to L as r tend to infinity

ii)if [itex](a_n)[/itex] tends to infinity as n tends to infinity, then [itex]a_{n_r}[/itex] tends to infinity as r tend to infinity

using this result prove that

if [itex](a_n)[/itex] is an increasing sequence, prove that the converse of i) is true
Suppose [itex](a_n)[/itex] is divergent, then by ii), all the subsequences must be divergent, so, cant.

therefore [itex](a_n)[/itex] must be convergent, means [itex](a_n)[/itex] tends to M for some M,

apply i), then means M=L

but how come i didn't use the fact [itex](a_n)[/itex] is monotone, must be something wrong somewhere, help T_T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Tends to infinity" is not the only way a sequence can diverge. Oscillating sequences are also divergent.
 
aaaaaaaaaaaarghh, yes yes, thank you ^^

hmm, now i have to prove that [itex] (a_n)[/itex] is convergent,

i suspect i should prove that [itex] (a_n)[/itex] is bounded then, i know [itex] (a_n)[/itex] is monotone then, [itex] (a_n)[/itex] must be converging right? then continue like i was doing above right?
 
Last edited:
thank you very much