I Does Space Curvature Account for Gravity Between Individual Atoms?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between gravity and space-time curvature, questioning whether this curvature accounts for gravitational attraction at the atomic level. While gravity is fundamentally linked to spacetime curvature, its effects are often overshadowed by stronger forces in micro-scale interactions. Current models indicate that gravity is always a manifestation of spacetime curvature, but the application of this concept to quantum scales remains uncertain. General relativity fails to address gravity in the context of isolated atoms, and a comprehensive theory of quantum gravity is still lacking. The relevance of spacetime curvature in atomic interactions is still an open question in physics.
Martyn Arthur
Messages
128
Reaction score
25
TL;DR
Gravity/space curvature in relation to the accretion of dust in the Solar System et al
I am trying to come to terms with the two concepts of gravity, direct attraction between bodies (say dust even) and attribution to the curvature of space (time)
Looking at a physical sea coast I can envisage how every instance of the mass gravitational interactions of individual atoms or smaller can be incorporated into the ebb and flow of the tide, albeit on a scale that I can't even start to envisage from such an observation.

Having regard to the way in which the curvature of space-time is attributed to the 'gravity' between 'massive' solar objects is space curvature deemed to account also for gravitational attraction twixt even individual atoms or smaller?

Thanks
Martyn
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
On the micro scale there are generally other forces that are WAY stronger such that gravity is irrelevant but gravity IS spacetime curvature so ANY time gravity comes into play it is spacetime curvature.
 
Gravity is always spacetime curvature (not space curvature!) as it is currently modeled.

However, exactly how gravity works when the sources are small enough that quantum physics is important (such as an isolated atom) is not certain. General relativity can't do it and we don't yet have a working theory of quantum gravity. Depending on what that looks like, spacetime curvature may or may not turn out to be a useful model at that scale.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
477
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K