Does the Bragg equation hold for arbitrary diffractions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coffee_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bragg
Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
Any proof I look up of the Bragg law proves a simplified case of the situation.

The most common one is where both rays reflect on points that are perfectly on a vertical line like this:

http://pms.iitk.ernet.in/wiki/images/thumb/Jk2_1.png/400px-Jk2_1.png

The second most popular case is to assume that after diffraction the rays perfectly combine at the same spot like this:

http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/@api/de...?size=bestfit&width=444&height=236&revision=1

I don't see the point of all these simplified cases since the proof for a general case where the only assumption you make is that the waves fall in parallel and go out parallel and difract on respectively plane 1 and plane 2. The proof of the general is really not that much more difficult. At least I think I proved it. I'd like to confirm if it's correct fo the general case as I showed here:
 

Attachments

  • Scan1.jpg
    Scan1.jpg
    52.3 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
Scattering is coherent, you scatter at the whole plane either way. Looking at specific atoms in the plane just makes the analysis easier.
 
Is my 'proof' correct?
 
If the result is right, I guess so, I'm just saying it is more complicated than necessary.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top