Does the kinetic theory work for solids?

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic theory primarily applies to gases, where assumptions like weak intermolecular forces and large distances between molecules hold true. In solids, these assumptions break down due to strong intermolecular forces and close molecular packing, which affects internal energy and potential energy. The relationship pV/T as a constant does not apply to solids in the same way it does for gases, as solids do not exhibit significant volume changes under pressure. Therefore, the pressure exerted by solids does not manifest in the same manner as in fluids. The fundamental principles of kinetic theory are not valid for solids, making the application of gas laws inappropriate in this context.
Jamessamuel
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

i have been asked a question about a lump of iron being warmed, and to calculate the difference between enthalpy and internal energy. I did some algebra and found that the change in the product pV , in the case of a liquid would suffice. But, since the volume doesn't change (Assumed, still solid) the change is down to the pressure. Now, for a gas, pV/T is a constant so i would argue that if T increases, p should increase. But does this whole idea work for a solid? does it exert a pressure, and does it manifest in such a form that my fluid derivations (pV/T = constant) hold for said solid?

Regards,

James.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't think so. A lot of things that hold true for gases such as weak attractive forces, large intermolecular distances etc. just aren't true for solids. So the same laws don't apply.
 
Just look at the assumptions that are the basis of simple Kinetic Theory. The gas laws, based on simple kinetic theory, fail as soon as the molecules start to interact (as the gas is more and more compressed). Once that happens, some of the internal energy takes the form of Potential Energy (bonds stretching and compressing; referred to as Van der Waall's forces etc.). In a solid or liquid, this is a massive factor as the molecules are all so close together.
 
Jamessamuel said:
Hello all,

i have been asked a question about a lump of iron being warmed, and to calculate the difference between enthalpy and internal energy. I did some algebra and found that the change in the product pV , in the case of a liquid would suffice. But, since the volume doesn't change (Assumed, still solid) the change is down to the pressure. Now, for a gas, pV/T is a constant so i would argue that if T increases, p should increase. But does this whole idea work for a solid? does it exert a pressure, and does it manifest in such a form that my fluid derivations (pV/T = constant) hold for said solid?

Regards,

James.

As has been eluded to, you should have learned about the assumptions of the kinetic theory of gases. So look at them and figure out how many of those assumptions are not valid for a solid. Have you done this?

If you have, and it still doesn't answer your question, then please explain why you think all of the assumptions are still valid for a solid.

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top