Does the Material Cu2OSeO3 Have a Solid-Liquid Critical Point?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the existence of a solid-liquid critical point in materials, specifically focusing on Cu2OSeO3. Participants explore the theoretical framework surrounding phase transitions, the distinctions between crystalline and amorphous solids, and the implications of intermediate phases in achieving critical transitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that most substances do not exhibit a solid-liquid critical point, questioning the reasons behind this absence and whether there is a distinction between crystalline and amorphous solids.
  • One participant explains that according to Landau theory, the non-existence of solid-liquid critical points is due to the simultaneous breaking of multiple symmetries when transitioning between solid and liquid phases.
  • Another participant suggests that the presence of intermediate solid-like phases could allow for critical transitions, mentioning the KTHNY proposal and its implications for two-dimensional systems.
  • A later reply asks for examples of substances that exhibit the property of having intermediate phases that facilitate critical transitions.
  • One participant references a recent paper discussing the melting of a skyrmion lattice in Cu2OSeO3, which may relate to the discussed concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the existence of solid-liquid critical points and whether specific materials exhibit this property. Multiple competing views remain about the theoretical frameworks and examples of such materials.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to theoretical models and specific materials but does not resolve the complexities surrounding the existence of solid-liquid critical points or the conditions under which they may occur.

jfizzix
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
757
Reaction score
356
In many phase diagrams of a single substance, there is a triple point, where the solid, liquid and gas phases coexist in equilibrium, and there is a liquid-gas critical point beyond which, the transition between liquid and gas becomes continuous, and the substance is known as a super-critical fluid.

Is there a simple reason why in most substances there doesn't appear to be a solid-liquid critical point, where, say pressures are so large that solids can flow (e.g., the mantle of the Earth)? Is there a special distinction between crystalline and amorphous solids as far as this point goes? Are there substances with known phase diagrams that have solid-liquid critical points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The explanation of the (generic) non-existence of such a critical points lies in Landau theory. The main idea is to study the ways in which symmetry can be broken in the system, write down an analytic functional for a coarse-grained order parameter which can describe that symmetry breaking (the functional must satisfy all the symmetries of the microscopic system), and then to study how many parameters need to be tuned to obtain a critical point (that is, a non-analyticity in the free energy which is not a simple discontinuity in either the free energy itself or its first derivative).

In this approach, the issue with finding a critical point in the solid-liquid transition is that too many symmetries are broken at once in going between the two phases, since a solid simultaneously breaks the translational and rotational symmetries of the liquid. If you write down the Landau functional needed, the number of parameters which you need to tune in order to get a continuous transition is more than you have to play with in real life (where you usually just have, say, just temperature and pressure).

Is there a special distinction between crystalline and amorphous solids as far as this point goes? Are there substances with known phase diagrams that have solid-liquid critical points?

Yes, the existence of intermediate solid-like phases is the work around! If you have a system which can have an intermediate phase between the liquid and solid which breaks only one of the two symmetries, then you can imagine going from a liquid to a solid with critical transitions. For example, in two dimensions there can be an intermediate hexatic phase, and the famous "Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young" (or KTHNY) proposal outlined how transitions between the three phases can be continuous. I believe nematic systems can also undergo a multi-step series of transitions between liquid and solid phases which can be continuous in principle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MisterX and jfizzix
king vitamin said:
If you have a system which can have an intermediate phase between the liquid and solid which breaks only one of the two symmetries, then you can imagine going from a liquid to a solid with critical transitions.

Do you know of any substances that have this property?
 
I only know of the examples I gave.
 
jfizzix said:
Do you know of any substances that have this property?
Here is a very recent paper outlining the melting of a skyrmion lattice via an intermediate hexatic phase in the material Cu##_{2}##OSeO##_{3}##. It touches directly on many of the things king vitamin detailed.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.08352.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: king vitamin

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K