Does the nucleus of atoms of noble gases vibrate and emit E.M wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the nuclei of noble gas atoms vibrate and emit electromagnetic (E.M.) waves when exposed to an E.M. field. While electrons are known to oscillate and re-emit radiation, the potential vibration of the nucleus, despite its much greater mass, is questioned. It is noted that interactions with E.M. waves primarily affect nuclei only at specific resonance frequencies, such as in NMR experiments, where the focus is on magnetic moments rather than direct vibrations. The consensus suggests that the nucleus's contribution is often negligible compared to that of the electrons, leading to a lack of discussion on nuclear re-emission of E.M. radiation. Overall, the interaction of E.M. waves with isolated nuclei remains an underexplored area in comparison to electron behavior.
ns_phonon
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
People normally talk of electrons performing oscillatory motion when an electromagnetic field is incident on an atom.

But, won't the electric field of the E.M. wave cause the nucleus of the atom to vibrate...?
. "Note: Here I am talking of isolated atoms, that is atoms of noble gases, and not of molecules."

Please don't explain me the infrared absorption of light by molecules like CO2.


I understand that nucleus' mass is very high compared to electrons but even then won't it vibrate, with a very small amplitude or frequency...?

And if the the nucleus vibrates then we must think that vibrating positive charge of the nucleus will re-emit the radiation in all directions according to principles of electrodynamics.

But I have never heard of people talking of re-emission of electromagnetic radiation from nucleus. "People only talk of when a non-resonant light wave impinges upon an atom,it sets electrons of atoms vibrating and consequently they(electrons) re-emit this energy in the form of E.M. radiation in all direction according to a principle of electrodynamics." .

No one talks of re-emission of E.M. wave from a vibrating nucleus,oscillating with a much less amplitude than electrons......

Why Why Why:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An isolated nucleus will scatter electromagnetic waves just as electrons do.
If you have a neutral atom, on the other hand, the contributions from electrons dominate and cancel the effect from the nucleus - unless you hit specific resonance frequencies. of the nucleus.
 
won't the electric field of the E.M. wave cause the nucleus of the atom to vibrate...?

Yes, in principle. In practice, as mfb says, about interaction of EM wave with the nuclei makes sense only for resonance frequencies of nuclei when the electrons react negligibly. That probably happens in the NMR experiments, but then people from this field do not usually talk about nuclei vibrating, but rather talk about their magnetic moment rotating and about spin flipping.
 
Strictly speaking, it is the nucleus-electron system that is reacting to EM radiation and "vibrating". It is just that the mass ratio between the electron and the nucleus is such that there is not much difference between considering the relative motion and considering the nucleus as infinitely heavy and just looking at the motion of the electron.
 
Thanks to all for replies...!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top