Studying Relativity: Speed Limit of c in All Inertial Frames?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the understanding of special relativity and the implications of the speed of light (c) in different inertial frames. It highlights the confusion surrounding the postulates that all laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames and the existence of a speed limit. The Lorentz Transformation is introduced to explain how velocities are not additive, ensuring that light is observed traveling at c regardless of the observer's motion. The conversation questions whether the conclusion that an object traveling at c in one frame must do so in all frames can be derived solely from the stated postulates. Ultimately, it clarifies that the constancy of light's speed is a fundamental postulate, while the speed limit is a derived conclusion.
mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
How I studied relativity, we postulated that a particle traveling at c in one inertial frame travels at c in all inertial frame. But now looking through a book, I see that they just postulate that all laws of physics are same in all inertial frames, and that there is a speed limit (c). However then I don't quite get the reasoning on why if an object travels at c in one inertial frame, it follows that it must travel at c in all inertial frames...Is there a contradiction I'm not seeing that if you measure a particle traveling at c, someone moving much faster than you doesn't necessarily have to? This wouldn't change the speed limit in their frame.
(I know this is wrong, I'm just trying to deduce it from how the book did it).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In special relativity, velocities are not additive. If Observer A sees Observer B moving to the right at .9 c, and Observer B sees Observer C moving to the right at .9c, this does not mean that Observer A sees Observer C moving to the right at 1.8c. Rather, velocity obeys something known as the Lorentz Transformation, which in this case leads Observer A to see Observer C traveling at a mere .994c.

These Lorentz transformation rules guarantee that everyone sees light (or any other energetic massless particle) traveling at exactly c no matter how fast each Observer might be moving with respect to other Observers.
 


I know that, but those laws are derived based on the postulate that an object traveling at c in one reference frame travels at c in all reference frames. I want to know if you can get that based on the postulates:

1. All laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.
2. There is a speed limit.
 


Someone else is probably better equipped to answer this than I, but from a naive first inspection the two rules you name don't seem sufficient to uniquely define a transformation law.

"Objects observed to be traveling at c in one reference frame will be observed to be traveling at c in all reference frames" is usually taken to be one of the postulates. After all, that was one of the first observations that touched off the whole subject.
 


mmmboh said:
I know that, but those laws are derived based on the postulate that an object traveling at c in one reference frame travels at c in all reference frames. I want to know if you can get that based on the postulates:

1. All laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.
2. There is a speed limit.

Number 2 is not one of the postulates.

The second postulate is that the speed of light is constant for all inertial frames. The speed limit is a conclusion arrived at from the postulates.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K