1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Does this differential equation have a solution?

  1. Mar 8, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I'm examining the equation Ohm_Max + dOhm/dr = Ohm_Max - dOhm/dr and can't find any solutions other than the trivial one, Ohm(r) = 0 for all r.

    It's meant to determine if it is possible to build a length of conductor such that, upon dividing it at any arbitrary point, you'll find that the resistance behind is the same as the resistance ahead.

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Ohm(r) = 0. You can't have one because if Ohm(r) is even then dOhm/dr is odd.

    Ohm(r) = Ohm_Max at r = 0 for bounds -L/2 to L/2, captured in the use of Ohm_Max the constant.

    So the integral from -L/2 to 0 must equal the integral from 0 to L/2 meaning that dOhm/dr has to be even. This can't be as if Ohm(r) is odd then Ohm(0) must be 0 and not Ohm_Max. Odd functions cannot be valued at 0.

    Now, mathematically why can't this work? I apologize for the absence of TeX. I'm still getting used to the forum interface.
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 8, 2012 #2


    Staff: Mentor

    Instead of using Ohm as a variable, let's switch to R, for resistance. Your equation simplifies to 2 dR/dr = 0.

    This is a very simple differential equation to solve, and the solution is not necessarily the trivial solution, although that is one solution.
  4. Mar 8, 2012 #3
    Ohm is resistance. I apologize for the confusion.

    So R(r) = C1 * exp(0 * r) = C1

    Particular solution for R_Max is 0 as all of its derivatives are zero, putting in our constraint at R(0) we solve for our constant C1.

    R(0) = R_Max => C1 = R_Max except...

    R(-L/2) = 0

    R(L/2) = 0

    So C1 must be a function of r except C1 cannot be a function of r.

    This means that R does not depend on r. Meaning that dR/dr has to be zero (easily verified) and I just realized where my last post went off the rails.

    I meant to add that for bounds -L/2 and L/2 that R(r) must be zero.

    Let me add that.

    So the only way you can do it is if you stick a slider on some rails next to a circuit containing two perfectly matched resistors and call the resistors the system because I forgot the above constraint and I apologize.

    So, with this added constraint, what is the grand mathgalactic reason why it isn't a solvable problem? It's something fundamental. It has to do with the problem type and I can't put my finger on it.
  5. Mar 9, 2012 #4


    Staff: Mentor

    This is really the long way around.
    R'(r) = 0 ==> R(r) = C
    The idea is that if the derivative of something is zero, the something must be a constant.

    Now, using the initial condition R(0) = Rmax, then C = Rmax

    If you also know that R(L/2) = R(-L/2) = 0, then C = Rmax = 0.

    Am I missing something?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?