Does this equation (Einstein’s field equations in general relativity) equal 12?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
BadgerBadger92
Messages
207
Reaction score
131
This is a weird post but I posted on Facebook Einstein’s field equations in general relativity and I thought there could be numerous answers to this equation but some girl responded the answer was 12. Am I right in that there are numerous possible solutions or does it truly equal 12? Or is there something relating to this that does equal 12?

IMG_0427.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
BadgerBadger92 said:
This is a weird post but I posted on Facebook Einstein’s field equations in general relativity and I thought there could be numerous answers to this equation but some girl responded the answer was 12. Am I right in that there are numerous possible solutions or does it truly equal 12? Or is there something relating to this that does equal 12?
The girl got it wrong. Actually, the answer is 42. See https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(answer)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Bystander, FactChecker, BadgerBadger92 and 1 other person
Does what equal 12? R? g? Something else?
 
berkeman said:
Does what equal 12? R? g? Something else?
The entire equation itself. I thought there was something fishy with her answer
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
The ##\mu## and ##\nu## are indices that each take four different values - so that is a compact way of writing sixteen (4×4) equations. The number 12 is not sixteen values, so cannot be equal to the equations.

Somebody is pulling your leg.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BadgerBadger92
I thought so. She claimed to have a higher IQ than Einstein which I doubted after seeing her “answer.”
 
BadgerBadger92 said:
I thought so. She claimed to have a higher IQ than Einstein which I doubted after seeing her “answer.”
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe."

—(Quote attributed to Albert Einstein)
 
BadgerBadger92 said:
lol! I’ve never seen “Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy!”
You mean you have never read it, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy
  • #10
martinbn said:
You mean you have never read it, right?
There was a movie too but the book is better in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy and pinball1970
  • #11
kuruman said:
There was a movie too but the book is better in my opinion.
Yes, I have seen ii, but it seems that he thinks that there is only a movie.
 
  • #12
martinbn said:
Yes, I have seen ii, but it seems that he thinks that there is only a movie.
Or the TV series.
 
  • #13
martinbn said:
You mean you have never read it, right?
I thought it was a movie too
 
  • #14
BadgerBadger92 said:
I thought it was a movie too
It was a radio series originally, then a book series, then a TV series, and many years later a movie.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #15
BadgerBadger92 said:
I thought so. She claimed to have a higher IQ than Einstein which I doubted after seeing her “answer.”
She would not know that because on one ever measured it, there are only estimates but they are a best guess.
 
  • #16
The book is definitely best IMHO. It basically reads like one long standup routine with a "plot". :woot:

"He was so mad that for a moment he seemed to be steaming!"

"40 billion tons of hydrogen gas rose slowly above the swamp and managed to look slightly damp."

(Possibly paraphrased)

EDIT: Although, to be fair the movie did a good job.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K