Does This Line Integral Depend Only on Its End Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugatti79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Points
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around a line integral involving a vector field and its dependence on the endpoints of the curve. Participants are exploring the application of theorems related to conservative vector fields and potential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of conservative functions and vector fields, questioning which theorem is appropriate for demonstrating that the line integral is independent of the path taken. There is mention of the gradient theorem and attempts to identify a potential function.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing insights about the gradient theorem and potential functions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the identification of the potential function and its relationship to the force vector field.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on evaluating the integral without parameterization, and participants are navigating the constraints of the problem while discussing theorems applicable to conservative fields.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Show that the following line integral depends only on the end points of C by using a suitable theorem.

Then evaluate without parameterising it.

Homework Equations



\int_{(0,0)}^{(3,2)} 2xe^y dx + x^2e^y dy

The Attempt at a Solution



Is this the theorem...

\displaystyle \int F(x,y) dr =\int_C \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} dx +\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} dy =\int_a^b (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} \frac{dx}{dt} +\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} \frac{dy}{dt}) dt...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know about conservative functions and vector fields ?
 
lanedance said:
do you know about conservative functions and vector fields ?

Yes, this force vector field is conservative because g_x=f_y, hence is independent of path C..but I don't know what theorem to use?
 
how about the gradient theorem
 
lanedance said:
how about the gradient theorem

It must be simpler than I thought

I calculate the potential function \phi (x,y)= x^2 e^y +C. we know the gradient of the potential function is the force vector field given in the question. I integrated backwards to get the potential, s I guess that's the theorem..right?

I evaluate the force field to be 9e^2...based on \displaystyle \int \nabla \phi \dot dr = \phi(x_1, y_1) - \phi (x_0, y_0)...
 
looks good
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K