Does this sequence converge or diverge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teixe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence or divergence of the sequence defined as an = [(2^n)(n!) + 1]/(n^n). The original poster expresses initial thoughts of convergence due to the denominator but struggles to demonstrate this and seeks guidance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods including the squeeze theorem and the ratio test. The original poster attempts to apply logarithmic transformations and L'Hopital's rule but questions the validity of their approach. Others suggest revisiting the original sequence and using the ratio test to analyze convergence.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to assess the sequence's behavior. Some participants provide guidance on the application of the ratio test, while others clarify misconceptions regarding logarithmic limits and the implications of comparing sequences. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions that this problem was part of an exam, indicating a time constraint and pressure to perform well. There are references to prior academic performance and emotional responses to the challenges faced in the course.

teixe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. an= [(2^n)(n!) + 1]/(n^n)At first glance, I thought it would be a convergent sequence because of the (n^n) in the denominator. But after trying and not being able to show its convergence, I compared it to (2/n)^n with the squeeze theorem. (Basically inf > an > (2/n)^n)

I set the limit as n approaches inf, took the natural log and put 1/2n as the denominator. I used the L'Hopital method and got to lim e^((-2/n^2)(n/2)/(-1/n^2)), which canceled out to lim e^n.

I concluded that the sequence diverges. Did I do this correctly? This problem's been bugging me for two days now. Guidance please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is true your original sequence diverges. But showing it's greater than 2^n/n^n won't prove that, because 2^n/n^n converges to 0. If you take the log(2^n/n^n) you get log(2^n)-log(n^n)=n*log(2)-n*log(n). That's not a ratio you can apply l'Hopital to. So I really don't know how you got that limit. It really goes to -infinity. What I would do is go back to your original sequence and do a ratio test. Find lim a_(n+1)/a_n. If that ratio is greater than 1, it diverges.
 
Oh, thanks!

I did (2/n)^n and took the ln of all that. I fail to see how that's not indeterminate (0 to the infinity?)...

This was actually on my exam Monday. I used both the squeeze theorem and ratio test, but I didn't think the ratio test would get me points because I thought that was reserved for series only?

Not sure if I did all the algebra right, but doing the ratio test for (2^(n)n!/n^n) got me 2/e which is less than 1. I remember on the exam I got a value greater than 1... This discrepancy is strange.

I think focusing on this one problem for so long has warped my super algebra skills. Other finals to study for.

But yeah, I started off on the wrong foot with this problem because of the n^n in the denominator. Tricky I guess :3 Fingers crossed for partial credit.
 
You usually apply the ratio test to series, that's true. But it can also be applied to sequences. Which is pretty obvious if you think about it. Whether you got something larger than 1 or less than 1 depends on whether you were computing an+1/an or an/an+1. I get 2/e for the ratio of an+1/an. OOPS. Wait. I just realize I got it wrong for just that reason. an does converge, sorry about that. lim an+1/an=2/e. But it's still true that showing an is greater than a convergent sequence doesn't show it converges.
 
...ok. Yes I know it makes sense to do all that sorry I'll go and be sad about that problem now.
 
On the thing about 2^n/n^n. Taking log gives you n*log(2/n). That's not indeterminant. It's infinity*(-infinity). The limit is -infinity. The log of 2^n/n^n goes to -infinity. 2^n/n^n goes to zero.
 
teixe said:
...ok. Yes I know it makes sense to do all that sorry I'll go and be sad about that problem now.

I think you'll do better next time. Don't be that sad.
 
That was for the final, though. Ahh.. I was told by upperclassmen that I'd feel dread and feel like giving up, and that time has come. College is hard. And misery-inducing. But enough about that problem, I guess I'll just have to see how I did on the rest of the test, which had only 8 problems and took me 3 hours to do.

Thanks for your help, though. I could actually feel my heart fall after realizing I had it compleeetely wrong, that was pretty extreme haha. This will only make winter break sweeter.
 
Ok, if you give up, you won't get another chance at a problem like that. For the record, I think you did pretty well, even if it doesn't show up on the scores for the test. You understood what I said, you did apply the ratio test and got the correct limit, and I didn't have to pound your head to make you realize it (unlike some other people around here). I'd suggest not giving up. You have potential.
 
  • #10
Thanks for the kind words.

But I kind of gave up on getting a good grade on my math class. All that studying for naught! A- on hw, B- on first midterm, an A on the the second midterm, and I shudder to see what I got on this final. I hope the curve will be generous!

With all this damn knowledge about Calc II, I think I'll be a great private tutor for my roommate who'll be taking this course next quarter. :)

I'm sure the sadness will wear away some day
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K