Does Weight on Feet Wear You Out 5x as Much on a Hike?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter liz32
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy expenditure associated with carrying weight on one's feet compared to carrying weight in a backpack during hiking. Participants explore the implications of weight distribution and movement dynamics in relation to physical exertion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the work done is greater for weight on the feet due to the vertical distance moved with each step, suggesting a ratio of five to one compared to a backpack.
  • Another participant questions whether pushing a weight on a cart requires work, indicating a potential misunderstanding of work in physics.
  • A different participant proposes that energy savings may come more from acceleration and deceleration dynamics rather than just vertical height, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a steady pace.
  • There is a correction regarding the attribution of the work-energy principle, with one participant claiming that Coriolis, not Newton, formulated the principle of "Work equals Force times Distance."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between weight on feet and energy expenditure, with no consensus reached on the validity of the five-to-one ratio or the implications of acceleration and deceleration in energy use.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the mechanics of hiking and the effects of weight distribution remain unexamined, and there are unresolved questions about the definitions of work and energy in this context.

liz32
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Four hundred years ago Sir Isaac Newton pointed out that Work equals Force times Distance. Work is the energy needed to carry a heavy load over the landscape. The weight of the load is the Force against gravity. Each step forward requires a small Distance upward and here is where the work is done. Indeed the old-as-dirt adage that "a pound on your feet equals five on your back" follows because on average feet move, say, five inches upward with each step forward. Meanwhile the pack moves but an inch upward in the process. Thus the Work needed to move one pound of footwear one step is five times the Work needed to move one pound of pack weight, because the feet are lifted five times the Distance the pack is lifted. At least that's how I figure it.

I understand that work is only done when there is a force to resist it but will weight on you feet really wear you out on the end of a hike as much as fives times that weight in your pack?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
liz32 said:
Four hundred years ago Sir Isaac Newton pointed out that Work equals Force times Distance. Work is the energy needed to carry a heavy load over the landscape. The weight of the load is the Force against gravity. Each step forward requires a small Distance upward and here is where the work is done. Indeed the old-as-dirt adage that "a pound on your feet equals five on your back" follows because on average feet move, say, five inches upward with each step forward. Meanwhile the pack moves but an inch upward in the process. Thus the Work needed to move one pound of footwear one step is five times the Work needed to move one pound of pack weight, because the feet are lifted five times the Distance the pack is lifted. At least that's how I figure it.

I understand that work is only done when there is a force to resist it but will weight on you feet really wear you out on the end of a hike as much as fives times that weight in your pack?

Welcome to the PF. So are you saying that pushing the weight on a cart with wheels on a level road requires no work?
 
i don't know, i am just asking if weight on the feet will end up costing you more energy (proportional to the distance it is moved against gravity) than the weight added to a backpack.
 
Hey buddy. I hope I'm qualified to answer your question...

But yes you would be saving a significant amount of energy, not necessarily due to the increase in vertical height, as it is mostly to due with acceleration and deceleration, and the implications they bring. You realize, your feet have to stop and accelerate (quite quickly unless you want to trip,) to over double your body's speed in order to catch up and keep you upright. That stop and go would be difficult with any weight, but if you use the same weight and kept its inertia going at a relatively steady pace, it will seem much more effortless.

All about mass x acceleration!
 
liz32 said:
Four hundred years ago Sir Isaac Newton pointed out that Work equals Force times Distance.
Nope.

Coriolis formulated "Work equals Force times Distance" , not Newton.

And Coriolis did that just 180 years ago, in a paper from 1829 or so.
 
thanks impavid
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K