MHB Domenic's question at Yahoo Answers regarding computing the work to empty a tank

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus II question?? Work/pumping fluids? HELP!?


A tank containing oil is in the shape of a downward-pointing cone with its vertical axis perpendicular to ground level. In this exercise we will assume that the height of the tank is h=16 feet , the circular top of the tank has radius r=8 feet, and that the oil inside the tank weighs 55 pounds per cubic foot.
How much work (W) does it take to pump oil from the tank to an outlet that is 3 feet above the top of the tank if, prior to pumping, there is only a half-tank of oil? Note: "half-tank" means half the volume in the tank.
Note: For this problem a pound is to be taken as a unit of weight (not of mass), so it is not necessary to multiply by the gravitational acceleration constant in order to find the work.

PLEASE HELP. Thank you

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello domenic,

I prefer to work problems like this in general terms, and derive a formula we may then plug our data into. Let's let the base radius of the conical tank be $r$, and the height be $h$.

Let's orient a vertical $y$-axis along the axis of symmetry of the tank, where the origin is at the bottom of the tank, and the initial depth of the fluid in the tank is $y_0$. We wish to find the amount of work $W$ is needed to pump all of the fluid to a point some distance $z$ above the top of the tank.

Now, if we imagine slicing the cone of fluid we wish to remove into disks, we may state, using work is force $F$ times distance $d$ for a constant force:

$$dW=Fd=wd$$

The force exerted is equal to the weight $w$ of the slice.

The weight $w$ of the slice is the product of the weight density $\rho$ in [math]\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3}[/math], and the volume [math]V=\pi r_s^2\,dy[/math] of the slice, i.e.:

$w=\rho\pi r_s^2\,dy$

The radius of the slice can be found by similarity.

$$\frac{r_s}{y}=\frac{r}{h}\,\therefore\,r_s=\frac{r}{h}y$$

The distance the slice must be vertically moved against gravity is:

$d=h+z-y$

Putting it all together, we have:

$$dW=\frac{\rho\pi r^2}{h^2}\left(hy^2+zy^2-y^3 \right)\,dy$$

Summing up all the work elements through integration, we obtain:

$$W=\frac{\rho\pi r^2}{h^2}\int_0^{y_0} (h+z)y^2-y^3\,dy$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the FTOC, there results:

$$W=\frac{\rho\pi r^2}{12h^2}\left[4(h+z)y^3-3y^4 \right]_0^{y_0}=\frac{\rho\pi r^2y_0^3}{12h^2}\left(4(h+z)-3y_0 \right)$$

Now, if $V$ is the volume of the tank, let $kV$ be the initial volume of fluid in the tank, where $0\le k\le1$. To find the initial depth $y_0$ of the fluid in terms of $k$, we may use:

$$\pi\left(\frac{r}{h}y_0 \right)^2y_0=k\pi r^2h$$

$$y_0^3=kh^3$$

$$y_0=h\sqrt[3]{k}$$

Hence:

$$W=\frac{\rho\pi hkr^2}{12}\left(4(h+z)-3h\sqrt[3]{k} \right)$$

We now have a formula into which we may plug the given and known data:

$$\rho=55\,\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3}$$

$$h=16\text{ ft}$$

$$k=\frac{1}{2}$$

$$r=8\text{ ft}$$

$$z=3\text{ ft}$$

And so we find for this problem:

$$W=\frac{\left(55\,\dfrac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3} \right)\pi \left(16\text{ ft} \right)\left(\dfrac{1}{2} \right)\left(8\text{ ft} \right)^2}{12}\left(4(16+3)-3(16)\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2}} \right)\text{ ft}=\frac{28160\pi}{3}\left(19-6\sqrt[3]{4} \right)\text{ ft}\cdot\text{lb}$$

$$W\approx190959.32\text{ ft}\cdot\text{lb}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top