Dominated convergence question

  • Thread starter Thread starter bbkrsen585
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dominated convergence theorem (DCT) in the context of measurable sets and Lebesgue integrability. It establishes that for a sequence of nondecreasing measurable sets E1, E2, ..., with finite measure, a measurable function f is integrable on the union E if and only if the integral of the absolute value of f over each Ek remains uniformly bounded. Furthermore, it concludes that if this condition holds, the limit of the integrals of f over Ek converges to the integral of f over E.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lebesgue integrability
  • Familiarity with measurable sets and their properties
  • Knowledge of the Dominated Convergence Theorem (DCT)
  • Experience with characteristic functions in measure theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Dominated Convergence Theorem in detail
  • Explore applications of Lebesgue integration in real analysis
  • Investigate the properties of measurable functions and their integrability
  • Learn about the implications of uniform boundedness in integration
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone studying measure theory and Lebesgue integration will benefit from this discussion.

bbkrsen585
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I was wondering if someone could help me out with the following.

Let E1, E2, ... be a sequence of nondecreasing measurable sets, each with finite measure.

Define E = [tex]\bigcup[/tex]Ek, where E is the union of an infinite number of sets Ek.

Suppose f is measurable and Lebesgue integrable on each Ek.

Prove:

1) f is integrable on E if and only if [tex]\int[/tex]Ek|f| stays uniformly bounded (over all Ek).

2) Moreover, prove that if the equivalence in (1) holds then,

lim [tex]\int[/tex]Ek f = [tex]\int[/tex]E f.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that the => direction of 1) is immediate from the DCT if you set

[tex]g_k = f \cdot 1_{E_k}[/tex]

where

[tex]1_{E_k}[/tex] is the characteristic function of [itex]E_k[/itex].

You can use [itex]f[/itex] itself as the dominating function.

The other direction will take a bit more work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K