Dot product: ##\vec{D} \cdot\vec{E}## in SI units

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of electrostatic energy involving the dot product of the D-field and E-field, specifically in the context of SI units. Participants are exploring the implications of these calculations and the associated units.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the units resulting from the dot product of the D-field and E-field, questioning whether the final units remain V/m² or change to V²/m⁴. There are inquiries about the relationship between the dot product and electrostatic energy, as well as the implications of integrating these units over a volume.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants providing insights into the nature of the dot product and its units. Some participants are questioning assumptions regarding the units of ε and the conditions under which they are being used. There is a mix of attempts to clarify concepts and explore mathematical implications without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted the importance of understanding the units involved in the calculations and the necessity of including differential elements when discussing integrals. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the constants used in the equations.

millahjallar
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Electromagnetism - physics
Dot product: ##\vec{D} \cdot\vec{E}## in Si-units
Relevant Equations
D dot E
I'm trying to calculate the electrostatic energy, and I'm wondering what happens when I dot the D-field and E-field, with Si-units V/m**2. This is my equation:

D dot E = (-4x(epsilon) V/m**2)(-4x V/m**2) + (-12y(epsilon) V/m**2)(-12y V/m**2)

Are the final Si-unit still V/m**2 or V**2/m**4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

The dot product is the vector equivalent of multiplication, so the units multiply as well. E.g. $$dW = \vec F \cdot d\vec {r}$$ has units of energy.

For future reference you might like to learn some Latex to render your equations:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: millahjallar
Hello @millahjallar ,
:welcome: ##\qquad##!
The units of ##\vec D\cdot\vec E## are the product of the units of ##D## and ##E##.
The units of ##\varepsilon## are not [1] !

##\ ##
 
PeroK said:
:welcome:

The dot product is the vector equivalent of multiplication, so the units multiply as well. E.g. $$dW = \vec F \cdot d\vec {r}$$ has units of energy.

For future reference you might like to learn some Latex to render your equations:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
Okay, great - thanks!
I should definitely learn how to write in latex.. :)
 
Note: The dot product itself is a mathematical construct and not related to any particular set of units.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: millahjallar
millahjallar said:
Okay, great - thanks!
I should definitely learn how to write in latex.. :)
If I want to take the triple-integral of V^2/m^4, does the unit change?
Again - sorry for not currently knowing how to write in latex.
 
Orodruin said:
Note: The dot product itself is a mathematical construct and not related to any particular set of units.
Okay, thank you! But if I want to take the triple-integral of V^2/m^4, does the unit change?
Sorry for not currently knowing how to write in latex.
 
millahjallar said:
I'm trying to calculate the electrostatic energy
Remind me what that dot product has to do with the electrostatic energy ...

millahjallar said:
if I want to take the triple-integral
A triple integral of something is usually over the volume. The integration adds a factor of ##m^3## to whatever is integrated :smile:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: millahjallar
millahjallar said:
Okay, great - thanks!
I should definitely learn how to write in latex.. :

BvU said:
Hello @millahjallar ,
:welcome: ##\qquad##!
The units of ##\vec D\cdot\vec E## are the product of the units of ##D## and ##E##.
The units of ##\varepsilon## are not [1] !

##\ ##
Okay, thank you! :)
 
  • #10
millahjallar said:
If I want to take the triple-integral of V^2/m^4, does the unit change?
Again - sorry for not currently knowing how to write in latex.
For an integral, the integrand is essentially multiplied by the variable over which integration takes place: displacement is the area under a velocity against time graph: metres/second times seconds give metres. Mass is the integral of density (mass per unit volume) integrated over a volume. Etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: millahjallar
  • #11
BvU said:
Remind me what that dot product has to do with the electrostatic energy ...A triple integral of something is usually over the volume. The integration adds a factor of ##m^3## to whatever is integrated :smile:

##\ ##
I want to find the electrostatic energy in a field, and in order to do so, I'm using the formula W=0.5 integral_V(D dot E)dV.
Thank you so much for your reply! :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #12
millahjallar said:
I want to find the electrostatic energy in a field, and in order to do so, I'm using the formula W=0.5 integral_V(D dot E)dV.
Thank you so much for your reply! :)
Are you using units where ##\epsilon_0 = 1##?
 
  • #13
The energy density ##u## (= energy per unit volume ##V##) is given by ##u=\frac{1}{2}\vec D\cdot\vec E##. What would be the dimensions of the integral ##\int \frac{1}{2}\vec D\cdot\vec E~dV##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #14
millahjallar said:
Okay, thank you! But if I want to take the triple-integral of V^2/m^4, does the unit change?
##\frac{V^2}{m^4}## is not integrable. You need a differential element in there.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Mister T said:
##\frac{V^2}{m^4}## is not integrable. You need a differential element in there.
Poster is referring to the units

##\ ##
 
  • #16
BvU said:
Poster is referring to the units

##\ ##
And the units depend on which differential element you choose.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
Are you using units where ##\epsilon_0 = 1##?
No, e = -1.60 :)
 
  • #18
-1.60 C
 
  • #19
millahjallar said:
Dot product: ##\vec{D} \cdot\vec{E}## in Si-units
millahjallar said:
-1.60 C
This makes no sense at all. There is a world of difference between ##e = 1.60217662 \times 10^{-19} ## Coulomb and ##\varepsilon_0 = 8.8541878128 10^{-12} ## Farad/meter ( or kg-1 m-3 s4 A2 ).

##e## doesn't even occur in the exercise !

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #20
millahjallar said:
No, e = -1.60 :)
Please read and answer the question in post #13.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #21
very interesting conversation, cleared my concept.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
790
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
935