Double exponential integration (a,∞) - how to implement.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on integrating a complex function from a specified limit to infinity, highlighting the challenges of using traditional numerical methods like Simpson's and Trapezoidal rules. A transformation of variables is suggested to simplify the integral, changing the limits from (a, ∞) to (0, ∞) by letting u = X + a. This approach allows for the use of Gaussian quadrature, which is noted to be more efficient and accurate for such integrals. The original poster seeks a detailed algorithm for implementing this transformation and the integration process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the benefits of variable transformation and advanced numerical methods for tackling difficult integrals.
maistral
Messages
235
Reaction score
17
NOTE: This isn't homework.

So I'm trying to integrate a really awkward integral with limits from a to infinity;

\int^{∞}_{30471.2729807}(\frac{83.1451 * 373.15}{X})-(\frac{83.1451 * 373.15}{X-30.4811353}-\frac{5534906.5380409}{X^2})dX

Since the Simpson's and Trapezoidal would be really awkward to use with these (I literally used a limit of 30471.2729807 to 1000000000 (lol)) I tried to search for other alternatives, and I found this.

I can't understand how this is implemented though. This transformation

\int^{∞}_{a}f(X)dX → \int^{∞}_{0}f(X+a)dX

is bothering me as well. Can someone point me where a step-by-step algorithm of the method's implementation is made; or if possible, someone tell me how it was done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a transformation of variables: let u=X+a; then for X=(a,inf) we get u=(0,inf), and dX = du.

All they did was skip the formal analysis and went directly to the result: f(u) = f(X+a).
 
I see. Got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K