Double exponential integration (a,∞) - how to implement.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the integration of a complex integral with limits from a specified value to infinity. Participants explore methods for implementing the integration, particularly in the context of numerical techniques suitable for handling infinite limits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning, Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an integral that poses challenges for traditional numerical methods like Simpson's and Trapezoidal rules due to its limits and complexity.
  • Another participant explains that the transformation of variables is a common technique, clarifying that substituting \( u = X + a \) allows the integral to be expressed over a new interval.
  • A different approach is suggested, where Gaussian quadrature is proposed as a potentially more efficient and accurate method for calculating the integral over the infinite interval.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges of the integral and the utility of variable transformation, but there are differing opinions on the best numerical method to use, with no consensus reached on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the effectiveness of the proposed numerical methods, and there may be limitations related to the assumptions of convergence and the specific properties of the integral being evaluated.

maistral
Messages
235
Reaction score
17
NOTE: This isn't homework.

So I'm trying to integrate a really awkward integral with limits from a to infinity;

[itex]\int^{∞}_{30471.2729807}(\frac{83.1451 * 373.15}{X})-(\frac{83.1451 * 373.15}{X-30.4811353}-\frac{5534906.5380409}{X^2})dX[/itex]

Since the Simpson's and Trapezoidal would be really awkward to use with these (I literally used a limit of 30471.2729807 to 1000000000 (lol)) I tried to search for other alternatives, and I found this.

I can't understand how this is implemented though. This transformation

[itex]\int^{∞}_{a}f(X)dX → \int^{∞}_{0}f(X+a)dX[/itex]

is bothering me as well. Can someone point me where a step-by-step algorithm of the method's implementation is made; or if possible, someone tell me how it was done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a transformation of variables: let u=X+a; then for X=(a,inf) we get u=(0,inf), and dX = du.

All they did was skip the formal analysis and went directly to the result: f(u) = f(X+a).
 
I see. Got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K