Double integral of volume bounded by plane and paraboloid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the volume of the solid bounded by the plane z=x and the paraboloid z=x^2+y^2. Participants clarify that these surfaces do indeed bound a volume, intersecting at specific points in the xy-plane, which can be represented as a circle. The conversion to polar coordinates is suggested for simplifying the double integral, with the final form being r=cos(θ) for the polar representation. The correct double integral setup is also debated, emphasizing the importance of visualizing the graphs involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates transformation
  • Knowledge of graphing 3D surfaces and intersections
  • Basic concepts of volume calculation in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to convert Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates in integrals
  • Study the method of visualizing 3D surfaces and their intersections
  • Explore the application of double integrals in calculating volumes
  • Practice evaluating integrals involving paraboloids and planes
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in multivariable integration, and anyone seeking to understand the geometric interpretation of double integrals.

braindead101
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Evaluate the volume of the solid bounded by the plane z=x and the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2


I have tried to graph this, and they don't bound anything? have i graphed it wrong. and is there a way to do these problems where you don't need to draw the graph.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
braindead101 said:
Evaluate the volume of the solid bounded by the plane z=x and the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2


I have tried to graph this, and they don't bound anything? the graph says they intersect at a line, so they don't bound anything... have i graphed it wrong. and is there a way to do these problems where you don't need to draw the graph.
They surely do bound something! If the 3-d graph bothers you assume y= 0. Then your graphs are z= x and z= x^2, which intersect at (0,0) and (0,1).
Letting z= x in z= x^2+ y^2, you get x^2- x+ y^2= x^2- x+ 1/4 + y^2= 1/4 so
(x-1/2)^2+ y^2= 1/4. In the xy-plane, that's a circle with center at (1/2, 0) and tangent to the y-axis. That's the projection of the actual intersection in the xy-plane.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Graphs can be very useful in this type of problem.

z = x is like a ramp that runs the length of the y axis.

What does the parabola equation describe? Can you visualize it?
 
This was also posted in the homework forum. I'm merging it into that thread.
 
am i able to change to polar coordinates with the shifted circle? or should i keep it in x y form

let me know if this is correct:
\int^{1/2}_{0}\int^{\sqrt{1/4-(x-1/2)^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{1/4-(x-1/2)^{2}}} x^{2} + y^{2} dy dx

I think i want to convert to polar form.. but i don't know what to do with the 1/4 inside the ( ) with the x when converting.
also, is my double integral even correct?
 
If it were me, I would convert to polar coordinates. If (x- 1/2)^2+ y^2= 1/4, then x^2+ y^2- x+ 1/4= 1/4 or x^2+ y^2- x= 0 so, in polar coordinates r^2- rcos(\theta)= 0 and, finally, r= cos(\theta). Looks nice!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K