Double slit experiment with magnetic traps

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a modified double-slit experiment using magnetic traps to keep electrons in superposition while measuring magnetic induction without causing wavefunction collapse. Participants debate whether the proposed setup would inadvertently provide information about the electron's path, leading to wavefunction collapse. It is noted that any interaction with the environment, including the magnetic traps' atomic structure, could lead to decoherence or collapse, regardless of the measurement method. The conversation highlights the challenges of maintaining superposition in quantum experiments and the delicate balance required to prevent environmental interactions. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that achieving the original goal of preserving superposition in this context may be problematic.
  • #31
PeroK said:
This is perhaps a good time to pause, reflect and consider learning a bit more about QM, what it says and what it doesn't say.

There is not a lot of point in arguing about things that are well-established, theoretically and experimentally.
Thx for all the answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
PeterDonis said:
The magnetic induction measurement...is a measurement. That's why we use expressions like, oh, say, "measure the magnetic induction" (which is what you said in the OP of this thread) to describe it.
Correct. The difference is that I don't measure the effect or presence of a single electron, but the effect caused by the whole bunch of them. This is my idea of preventing the collapse of individual electrons, however stupid it sounds.
 
  • #33
Marcin said:
I don't measure the effect or presence of a single electron, but the effect caused by the whole bunch of them.

In other words, you run a large number of electrons through the experiment, and then measure the magnetic induction in each of the traps?

Marcin said:
This is my idea of preventing the collapse of individual electrons

It won't.

First, you'll have the problem that magnetic traps can't store large numbers of electrons--the Pauli exclusion principle prevents it (there are only a small number of states the electrons in the trap can be in, and once those states are filled you're done, the trap can't hold any more electrons).

Second, when you do the magnetic induction measurement, you'll just get two numbers for magnetic induction that will be approximately equal (since each electron has basically a 50-50 chance to go into one trap vs. the other). You won't get anything that shows interference between the electrons (which pretty much invalidates the point of doing a double slit experiment in the first place).

Third, even though you have multiple electrons in both traps, you haven't "prevented collapse"; you've just changed the states that the electrons collapse into when you make the magnetic induction measurement, as compared to the case where you only have one electron and it has a 50-50 chance to be in either trap. (The states change because if the presence of multiple electrons in the trap affects the energy levels of the states, due to the Coulomb repulsion between the electrons.)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Marcin
  • #34
@PeterDonis I get it, you've made it clear. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
561
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K