Double Slit/Photo Detection/Is it the SAME photon?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Supaiku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the double slit experiment and the nature of photons, specifically whether the photon that is fired is the same as the one that hits the screen. Participants clarify that photons can be absorbed and re-emitted, complicating the notion of identity. However, in a vacuum chamber, where external factors like air and dust are eliminated, the experiment focuses on interference patterns rather than the medium. The consensus is that while the question of whether it is the "same" photon is philosophical, it is generally accepted that it is the same particle in terms of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of photon behavior and properties
  • Concept of particle identity in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the double slit experiment on quantum mechanics
  • Study the concept of photon absorption and re-emission
  • Explore the philosophical implications of particle identity in quantum physics
  • Learn about vacuum chambers and their role in quantum experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the philosophical aspects of particle identity and behavior in experiments like the double slit.

Supaiku
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I was reading about the double slit experiment (it seems I always glean a better understanding every time I read, which shows how little I really get it in the first place), and I was wondering:
Is there some way for us to know that the photo that was fired (given a single photo experiment) is actually the SAME photo that hits the screen?
Perhaps I don't have a proper understanding of what photos are - if this is the case let me know.
But if I remember photons are absorbed and re-emitted all the time, right? Like light hits something and if it bumps and electron around then a photon is released?

If that is the case I don't see how you could say that the photon(s) that hit(s) the screen is/are actually the same one(s) that was/were fired if there are say... air particles, and and dust and whatever, not to mention some piece of plastic or metal to supply the slits...

Do I have a proper understanding? Close? Or do I totally not get it at all?
Thanks:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should probably read this, post #4: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=104715

Basically, your idea wouldn't make sense on a number of levels. For example, if you have a vacuum chamber there won't be air or dust. And the double slit experiment is not about the medium, it is about interference (usually self-interference).

As to whether it is the same photon or not: some of that answer is pholosophical/semantic. What is "the same"? Indistinguishable? Or do you imagine that every photon is unique and could conceptually be tracked in its travels? There are complicated issues in many ways, but the usual answer is: YES, it is the same particle.
 
Thanks, I'll read that link and post again when I've understood photons a bit better:P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
700
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K