Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Homework Help
Introductory Physics Homework Help
Double Slits, Calculating Wavelength
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="STEMucator, post: 4563928, member: 426227"] Friendly bump, Is it safe to say this problem is not solvable? If I knew the distance from a nodal line to the right bisector I could solve this, but I can't see how to get it for some reason. All I seem to know is the distance between two consecutive nodal points, namely ##\Delta x = 0.7375cm##. Would that mean half of that distance, ##\frac{\Delta x}{2}##, is the distance between a node and an antinode? If so, could I not consider the distance between the central maximum (which is exactly where the right bisector would happen to be) and the closest node to it? That would give me a workable value of ##x_1 = \frac{\Delta x}{2}## and ##n = 1##. This doesn't feel right to me though, does anyone have any thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Homework Help
Introductory Physics Homework Help
Double Slits, Calculating Wavelength
Back
Top