Double Sum Identity Problem Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter CompuChip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Double Sum Identity Problem, specifically the equation involving double summations of a function f(k) for integers m and n. The user has verified the identity using Mathematica for various values of m and n, confirming its validity under the condition m ≤ n. The user suggests that proving the identity may require careful manipulation of the double sums, including techniques such as shifting indices and changing the order of summation. Concrete examples are recommended to further explore the behavior of the function f(k).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double summation notation and manipulation
  • Familiarity with mathematical functions and sequences
  • Experience with Mathematica for computational verification
  • Knowledge of index shifting and summation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced techniques in summation manipulation
  • Learn about the properties of sequences and their implications in summations
  • Investigate the use of Mathematica for symbolic computation in mathematical proofs
  • Study examples of similar double sum identities and their proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students tackling advanced calculus or algebra, and anyone interested in combinatorial identities and their proofs.

CompuChip
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
49
Hi. The problem is as follows:

Homework Statement


Let m and n be integers, we may assume that (if they are not equal), m is the smallest. Then
[tex]\sum_{i=0}^m \sum _{j=0}^n f((m+n)-2 (i+j)) = \sum_{i=0}^m \sum _{j=0}^{-2 i+m+n} f((m+n)-2 (i+j))[/tex]
for some sequence [itex]f(k)_k[/itex].

Homework Equations


Anything you can think of, but probably just the standard manipulations on sums and some smart rewriting and/or separating different cases.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have reduced from a given question to the above statement, and I'm quite positive that I haven't made a mistake in this -- so the given statement should be true. It doesn't really look true to me though, so I plugged this into Mathematica: it seems to hold for any two [itex]m \le n[/itex] I choose, but I just don't see how to prove this. I think it involves a manipulation with the double sum, because if I remove the outer sum and consider i a fixed number in the rest of the expression, it doesn't seem to hold anymore (I always need one or more of the f(n) to be zero, which they aren't in general).
So I think the given information now is necessary and sufficient (e.g. no extra information on f(n) or m and n should be needed).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd start with concrete examples (m = 1, n = 2, etc.) to see how exactly it is working.
 
I already did, and I also explicitly worked out the multiplicities of the various f(m + n - 2 i) of the left hand side, I found it to be equal to
[tex] \sum_{i = 0}^{m - 1} (i + 1) f(m + n - 2i) +<br /> {\sum_{k = m - n}^{n - m}}' (m + 1) f(k) +<br /> \sum_{i = 0}^{m - 1} (i + 1) f(-(m + n - 2i)),[/tex]
where the prime in the second sum denotes summation over odd values only (so m - n, m - n + 2, ...).So I could just do the same for the right hand side and show that the multiplicity of each term is equal, but I was sort of hoping that the result can also be obtained by just manipulating the sums (e.g. operations like shifting indices, switching summation orders, etc.).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K