Doubt on this problem from David Morin's book - Intro to Classical Mech

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from David Morin's book on classical mechanics, specifically addressing doubts about the principles and equations related to the motion of a block on a slope. Participants explore concepts of velocity components, forces acting on the block, and the relationship between speed and direction in the context of friction and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the principle behind the equation stating that the total speed (V) and its component in the y-direction (Vy) should be constant, seeking clarification on the reasoning.
  • Others argue that the forces of gravity and friction are equal, leading to a constant relationship between deceleration and acceleration, suggesting that v + vf remains constant.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the explanation provided, arguing that the vector nature of acceleration must be considered rather than simple algebraic addition.
  • Concerns are raised about whether the block should gain speed in the downward direction due to friction balancing acceleration, suggesting a need for a differential equation approach.
  • Some participants propose that the final speed of the block (Vf) and its component in the y-direction should be equal, while others challenge this interpretation, questioning how Vf + Vf = 2Vf is derived.
  • A numerical simulation is mentioned, indicating that the speed may converge to V/2, but participants note that the explanation in the textbook oversimplifies the situation.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between total speed and its components, emphasizing that v represents the overall speed while vx and vy are directional components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the principles involved, with no consensus reached regarding the interpretation of the equations and the physical principles at play.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about forces acting on the block, the direction of motion, and the application of conservation principles. The mathematical steps and relationships between variables remain unresolved.

bksree
Messages
75
Reaction score
3
Will someone please explain the foll. doubts in this solved problem from David Morin's book.

TIA
sree
------------




DOUBTS :
1. What is the principle of eqn. 3.78 ? If V is block speed and Vy is its component in y dirn., why should V + Vy be constant ?

2. In Why should final speed ofblock Vf and its comp. in y direction be equal ?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a horrible looking argument. I can follow it, but I'm taking Bertrand Russell's position here when he said "The fact that I can't see what is wrong with it does not prove it is right".

Anyhow, assuming for the sake of argument that it is right:

1. He says the force of gravitiy down the plane, and the magnitude of the friction force (whatever direction it acts in), are always equal. Therefore, the deceleration due to friction in the direction of motion, and the acceleration down the plane, are always equal. So in each small increment of time, the reduction in v (the deceleration) equals the increase in vf (the acceleration).

So v + vf is constant.

2. He is assuming that the final motion will be in a straight line down the plane. That makes sense, because any sideways component of velocity would be reduced by the friction force, so the sideways velocity will decrease to 0.

Because the coefficient of friction is related to the angle of the plane, you know that motion straight down the plane will be at constant speed.

If the mass is moving straight down the plane, then its speed down the plane, vf, is equal to its total speed, v. And from (1) you know that v + vf = C = V
 
Honestly, I think this explanation makes little or no sense.
Edit: I'm talking about the attached doc file

The problem is that if the small increment of v in a small increment of time (I always call it acceleration, btw) is a rotating vector.
It cannot be added algebraically to the gravity acceleration, but a vector addition must be followed.

It is questionable whether the block should gain any speed at all in the down direction, because every acceleration is balanced by friction.
At minimum you should solve a differential equation. Stating vf+vf=C, sounds me too simple.
 
Last edited:
Dear AlephZero and Quinzio
many thankls for thhe reply
I'm confused. My thoughts are as below.
----------------
The block is moving initially with Vx = V (in x direction - which is in plane of slope), and Vy = 0 (y dirn is down slope). So one has to take sqrt (Vx 2 + Vy 2 ) = V. How can you add Vx + Vy and say it is constant ? What is the principle ?
(If consvn. of momentum principle is used then inila mom = mV, final = mVy, therefore Vy = V but this is not what is being done here)
In his explanation Vx final is not zero. He is calculating it using the reln in eqn 3.78.
How is Vf + Vf = 2 Vf obtained ? After along time x vel becomes zero and block begins moving down with Vf. How is 2 Vf obtained ?TIA
sree
 
This may be a realistic disposition of the accelerations here.
Acceleration due to friction has a component is the gravity direction (opposite) and it should be taken in account.

The gravity force has a normal component to v, so it will make the speed vector rotate, but whether or not it will end up to V/2, i would like a more complete explanation.[PLAIN]http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/4613/mgsina.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A simple numerical simulation like the one in the code below shows that the speed really ends up to V/2.
But the explanation is something more complex than vf+vf=C.
The analytical solution is a diffrential equation.
In the textbook, they're trying to make a difficult topic look easy, as a sort of magic trick. A very bad way to teach.
Code:
Dim friction_x As Double
        Dim friction_y As Double
        Dim speed As Double = 10
        Dim speed_x As Double
        Dim speed_y As Double
        Dim angle As Double = 0
        Dim delta_t As Double = 0.01
        Dim mgsina = 0.1
        For index = 0 To 50000
            friction_x = mgsina * Math.Cos(angle)
            friction_y = mgsina * Math.Sin(angle)
            speed_x = speed * Math.Cos(angle)
            speed_y = speed * Math.Sin(angle)

            speed_x -= (friction_x) * delta_t
            speed_y -= (friction_y - mgsina) * delta_t

            speed = Math.Sqrt(speed_x ^ 2 + speed_y ^ 2)
            angle = Math.Atan2(speed_y, speed_x)
        Next
 
bksree said:
The block is moving initially with Vx = V (in x direction - which is in plane of slope), and Vy = 0 (y dirn is down slope). So one has to take sqrt (Vx 2 + Vy 2 ) = V. How can you add Vx + Vy and say it is constant ? What is the principle ?
No, he is not addng vx+vy. He is saying the total speed v (i.e. sqrt (vx2 + vy2) + vy is constant.

(If consvn. of momentum principle is used then inila mom = mV, final = mVy, therefore Vy = V but this is not what is being done here)
You can't use conservation of momentum unless you include the forces acting on the particle. But if you don''t know the direction of motion, you don't know the direction of the friction force, so this doesn't help much.

In his explanation Vx final is not zero. He is calculating it using the reln in eqn 3.78.
How is Vf + Vf = 2 Vf obtained ? After along time x vel becomes zero and block begins moving down with Vf. How is 2 Vf obtained ?
v in the equations is not the same as vx. v is the speed of the block, in whatever direction it is moving.

At the start, v = vx because the block is moving sideways across the slope. At the end, v = vy because it is moving down the slope. In between, v2 = vx2 + vy2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
30K
Replies
2
Views
5K