Doubt with centripetal acceleration

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3
Good afternoon,

For a body in a curvilinear motion moving with velocity [tex]\vec{v}[/tex], velocity can be divided into two components (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_velocity#Two_dimensions" Wikipedia article): a component parallel to the position vector (the radius), which changes the magnitude of the radius and is given by dr/dt, and a component perpendicular to the radius vector, called tangential velocity (vt or [tex]v_{\bot}[/tex]), which changes the direction of the radius vector.
The angular velocity is determined by the the tangential velocity:
[tex]\omega = \frac{v_t}{r}[/tex]
And the centripetal acceleration is given by:
[tex]a_c = \frac{v^2}{r}[/tex] (1)
My question is: I have seen, in many places, that the centripetal acceleration can be written as:
[tex]a_c = r\omega^2 = \frac{v_t^2}{r}[/tex] (2)
But it doesn't seem right. Why is it defined like this so frequently?
EDIT: I realized that, in definition (2), "r" is the polar radius, and not necessarily the radius of curvature of the trajectory. Definition (1) is true when "r" is the radius of curvature. Am I right?

Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mathman said:
At any given point on the circle, the velocity is the tangential velocity.
Yes, but I defined tangential velocity as the component of velocity perpendicular to the position vector, like the Wikipedia article to which I linked.
What I'm trying to understand is why definition (2) uses [tex]\omega[/tex] = vt/r, while it seems that it should use v, not vt, in order to be compatible with (1) (I must be doing some confusion here).
 
Last edited: