Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Doubts in double slit experiment

  1. Aug 31, 2007 #1
    hi all...it is said that constructive interference happens when the path difference is nlambda and i think wavelength,frequency and amplitude of light going through both slits is the same then
    why is the central maxima is the brightest spot?
    why the brightness decreases when n increases?

    Since the amplitude is same why there is difference in the brightness of the bright fringes?
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 31, 2007 #2
    Because the amplitudes of the waves that constructively interfere are different at 'different n'.
  4. Aug 31, 2007 #3
    why does the amplitude changes and why the central fringe is the brightest one(why not other fringes)..can u explain in detail about it?..
  5. Aug 31, 2007 #4
    Each of the slits acts as a radial light source (in the right half of the plane). You can think of it like this: Lines of equal field intensity are semi-circles. The intensity at a point on the circle is inversely proportional to its size, or in other words its distance from the point source. Now if you draw the screen, the screen's center is on a smaller circle (drawn around the source) than a point further away is.
  6. Aug 31, 2007 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    This has nothing to do with quantum mechanics. I'm moving it out of there.

  7. Sep 2, 2007 #6

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The diffraction pattern of a double-slit is a actually a convolution between the characteristic sinc^2 single-slit pattern that has a bright central peak and secondary peaks at either side of the central peak, and the characteristic cos^2 fringes.

    The finite number of visible peaks comes about because of the finite width of the slits. As one reduces the width of the slits, the diffraction pattern will approach the ideal cos^2 case.

    This is wrong, slits don't act like point sources, they have a characteristic sinc^2 emittance profile. The reason the brightest fringe is in the centre is for the same reason single-slit diffraction has a bright central peak - it all boils down to the Huygens-Fresnel principle of secondary wavelets.

    Last edited: Sep 2, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Doubts in double slit experiment