Drag coefficient for plate perpendicular to airflow

Click For Summary
The drag coefficient for a flat plate perpendicular to airflow is typically between 1.98 and 2.05, as noted in the discussion. The specific dimensions of the plate (b/h ratio of 5.197) do not significantly alter this coefficient, especially since the flow conditions are primarily pressure drag. The Reynolds number is less critical for this configuration, as the flow will create vortex streets regardless of whether it is laminar or turbulent. For accurate results, consulting references with similar measurements is recommended. Overall, the established drag coefficient range remains applicable for the described scenario.
cxcxcx0505
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_coefficient
from wikipedia, it is written 1.98-2.05 for flat plate perpendicular to flow(2D) , but I have a differrent b/h ratio plate, where h=157mm and b=816mm , b/h=5.197

how to get the drag coefficient in this case?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What are your flow conditions?

Laminar? Turbulent?

Are we just talking about ambient air? or God blowing on the plate... =)

Give me the Reynolds number and I can help you out.

Cheers =)
 
For a plate perpendicular to the flow the reynolds number will not matter much. That wikipedia page gave a Cd for a 3d flat plate and you will probably be ok using that. Otherwise there is not an easy way to figure this out, your best bet would be to find some reference with similar measurements
 
harrisiqbal said:
What are your flow conditions?

Laminar? Turbulent?

Are we just talking about ambient air? or God blowing on the plate... =)

Give me the Reynolds number and I can help you out.

Cheers =)

Given that this is going to be entirely pressure drag, the state of the flow (laminar vs. turbulent) won't matter a bit. The only thing that could potentially play a role in would be the nature of the vortices that would be shed behind the plate, but the aft side is going to be massively separated and emitting vortex streets regardless.
 
Apologies,

Did not properly read OPs question. I thought he was talking about parallel flow on plate.

Whoops =)
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
29K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K