Drag force (air resistance) and acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving drag force (air resistance) and acceleration of a baseball thrown straight up. The drag force is proportional to the square of the velocity, and participants are tasked with determining the ball's acceleration when its speed is half its terminal speed, both while moving upward and downward.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Newton's second law and the effects of drag force on motion. There are attempts to derive equations for velocity and acceleration using calculus, with some questioning the integration steps involved. Others express uncertainty about simplifying their results to find acceleration at half terminal speed.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to solving the problem, with some participants providing insights into their methods and calculations. There is recognition of the complexity of the problem, particularly regarding the integration of velocity over time. While some participants appear to have made progress, there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves nonlinear calculus and that previous experiences with similar problems may not directly apply due to differences in the drag force model. There is also mention of the challenge posed by the time dependence of velocity in the integration process.

nautikal
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A baseball is thrown straight up. The drag force is proportional to v[tex]^{2}[/tex]. In terms of g, what is the ball's acceleration when its speed is half its terminal speed and a) it is moving up? b) it is moving back down?


Homework Equations


[tex]\sum F=ma[/tex]
[tex]mg + bv^{2}=ma[/tex] - When the ball is moving up
[tex]mg - bv^{2}=ma[/tex] - When the ball is moving back down


The Attempt at a Solution


We did something like this in class except we used [tex]mg - kv=ma[/tex]. We went through the calculus and got an equation for v(t) and then took the derivative to get a(t). Following my notes, I did the calculus to get an equation for v(t), and then I took the derivative to get an equation for a(t) using [tex]mg - bv^{2}=ma[/tex]. Below is what I got (in the attachment). I haven't done calculus like this since last May, so there may be some errors, but that's what I got.

So I got an answer for a(t) for when the ball is moving down, but I don't know what to do in order to simplify it so that it's acceleration for "when its speed is half its terminal speed".
 

Attachments

  • physics = wow.jpg
    physics = wow.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 1,845
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are really good at nonlinear calculus or I am missing something. How did you solve

[tex]\int_0^t dt = \int_{v(0)}^{v(t)} \frac{dv}{g + \frac{b}{m} v^2}[/tex]
 
Mindscrape said:
I think you are really good at nonlinear calculus or I am missing something. How did you solve

[tex]\int_0^t dt = \int_{v(0)}^{v(t)} \frac{dv}{g + \frac{b}{m} v^2}[/tex]

I did my algebra before this step a little differently to get [tex]\frac{1}{m}dt=\frac{1}{mg-bv^{2}}dv[/tex]

Then use U substitution to integrate. [tex]u=(mg-bv^{2})dv[/tex] and [tex]du=-2bvdv[/tex]

You need to first multiply both sides by [tex]-2bv[/tex] in order to be able to use the u substitution.

So you should have [tex]\frac{-2bv}{m}dt=\frac{-2bv}{mg-bv^{2}}dv[/tex]

Then plug in du and u so you have
[tex]\frac{-2bv}{m}dt=\frac{1}{u}du[/tex]

Next integrate... [tex]\int_0^t \frac{-2bv}{m}dt = \int_{v(0)}^{v(t)} \frac{1}{u}du[/tex]

So you get [tex]\frac{-bv^{2}t}{m}=ln\frac{mg-bv^{2}}{mg}[/tex]

The rest is algebra to solve for v.
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{mg}{b}(1-e^\frac{-bv^{2}}{m})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the problem is that you can't directly integrate

[tex]\int_0^t \frac{-2bv}{m}dt[/tex]

because there is a time dependence in v. Let me see what mathematica says.

Supposedly the solution is

[tex]v[t] = \frac{(\sqrt{g} \sqrt{m} Tan[\frac{(\sqrt{b} \sqrt{g} t)} {\sqrt{m}}])}{\sqrt{b}}[/tex]

Edit:
Yep, it gave the right soln. You could probably find the integral in an integral table somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Mindscrape said:
Yeah, the problem is that you can't directly integrate

[tex]\int_0^t \frac{-2bv}{m}dt = \int_{v(0)}^{v(t)} \frac{1}{u}du[/tex]

because there is a time dependence in t. Let me see what mathematica says.

Supposedly the solution is

[tex]v[t] -> \frac{(\sqrt{g} \sqrt{m} Tan[\frac{(\sqrt{b} \sqrt{g} t)} {\sqrt{m}}])}{\sqrt{b}}[/tex]

*shrugs*

I just went off my notes (where we had [tex]mg-kv=ma[/tex]), and in my notes we did [tex]\int_0^t \frac{-k}{m}dt = \int_{v(0)}^{v(t)} \frac{-k}{u}dv[/tex], where [tex]u=mg-kv[/tex] and [tex]du=-kdv[/tex]

We ended up getting [tex]v=\frac{mg}{k}(1-e^{\frac{-k}{m}t})[/tex]

But this was when we had [tex]F_{air}=kv[/tex]. Now we have [tex]F_{air}=bv^{2}[/tex] and things are a bit harder.

I now see that we have v and t in that integral so it doesn't work. Oh well, at least my paper looks all pretty with calculus all over it :).

P.S. How do you make the LaTeX images larger? I tried the \large and \huge but it doesn't have any effect. My solution for v two posts up is difficult to read.
 
Last edited:
I'm not really sure, but, if you haven't seen it already, there is a LaTeX for starters here

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997

Alternatively, just say \textrm{exp}(blah) if you don't want a cramped exponential.

Is this a physics 1 class, classical mechanics, something else? Not a trivial differential equation to solve.
 
nevermind...I got it. Was overthinking this problem too much. Just needed to solve for terminal velocity and then divide by half, then plug back into the F=ma equation.
 
what was the answer to this question?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
57
Views
3K