Velocity of a football with and without drag

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of a football projected straight up, considering scenarios with and without air drag. The subject area includes kinematics and dynamics, specifically focusing on the effects of linear and quadratic drag on velocity as a function of height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the problem, including the forces acting on the football and the equations of motion. There are attempts to isolate variables in the equations, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their approach. Questions arise regarding the correct application of signs in the equations and the treatment of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in isolating variables and expressing relationships between velocity and height. However, there are ongoing concerns about the complexity of the integrals involved in parts 2 and 3, with one participant questioning whether the difficulty is appropriate for the assignment. Guidance has been offered regarding variable separation and the importance of checking signs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the use of variables and the treatment of gravitational acceleration, with one participant explicitly stating they are using a negative value for g. There is also mention of the integrals being more complex than expected for a homework assignment.

N8G
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A professional thrower projects a football straight up in the air.
1. Assuming there is no air drag on the football, find the speed of the football as a function of height as the ball goes up.
2. Assuming the air drag on the football varies linearly with speed, find the speed of the football as a function of height as the ball goes up.
3. Assuming the air drag on the football varies quadratically with speed, find the speed of the football as a function of height as the ball goes up.

Homework Equations


F=ma which extends to mv dv/dx through chain rule
linear drag = c1v
quadratic drag = c2v^2

In each case the sum of the forces in the y direction equals mg minus the corresponding drag term

The Attempt at a Solution


1. mg = mv dv/dx ... separate variables, v(y) = root( 2gy +vo^2)
2. mg - c1v = mv dv/dx ... unsure how to isolate variables, haven't made it to part 3 but same issue

I'm hoping that I'm missing something simple that I've just overlooked, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you confusing x and y, or using them for the same thing?
If up is the positive x (or y) direction, the gravitational force is -mg, not mg.
 
N8G said:
mg - c1v = mv dv/dx ... unsure how to isolate variables
Try a bit harder... it really is very simple. You just want all the references to x on one side and all the references to v on the other.
And as mjc123 mentions, you should check your signs. Or maybe you are taking g to have a negative value (which is a valid approach).
 
My bad, any x's should be y's.

For the second part of the problem I have:
mvdv/dy = mg - cv which I reduce to
dv/dy = g/v - c/m
From here I don't see a way to isolate the v term on the rhs from the dy when separating my variables.

And I am taking g to be -9.8m/s^2
 
Never mind. I think I lost my mind and forgot about how division works.

I should be able to just say:

mg - cv = mv dv/dy

1 = mv/(mg-cv) dv/dy

dy = mv/(mg-cv) dv

Sorry for that.
 
N8G said:
Never mind. I think I lost my mind and forgot about how division works.

I should be able to just say:

mg - cv = mv dv/dy

1 = mv/(mg-cv) dv/dy

dy = mv/(mg-cv) dv

Sorry for that.
Glad to see you found your mind.
 
That being said, I figured out how to separate the variables but the integrals for part 2 and 3 both turned out to be horrendous given that I’m looking for the velocity wrt height functions. Each integral needed either aggressive attempts at u substitution or partial fraction decomposition followed by an annoying transform. I find it hard to believe thay professor intended that much work for a minute 10 pt homework assignment. Am I missing something elementary that would make my life easier?
 
N8G said:
the integrals for part 2 and 3 both turned out to be horrendous
They shouldn't. What do you get?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K